From: David P. <po...@cs...> - 2004-11-12 05:17:52
|
Thank you! I am glad to see it it being actively maintained. The HTML generated from the new version (still) doesn't pass the HTML validator: http://validator.w3.org/ Also, \bibitem doesn't seem to work anymore. (I am using it in the context of : \newcommand{\harvardyearleft}{[} \newcommand{\harvardyearright}{]} \newcommand{\harvarditem}[4][]{\bibitem[#2 \harvardyearleft #3\harvardyearright]{#4}} \newcommand{\harvardand}{\&} It worked in the previous version (2.7). I like the suggestion below, but would also like to see MathML incorporated, see, e.g., http://www.w3.org/TR/XHTMLplusMathMLplusSVG/ http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/ http://www.w3.org/Math/ http://www.mozilla.org/projects/mathml/ [But now I look at it, I couldn't get the w2 test suite to work on any of the 5 browsers I tested on my mac (Mozilla and Firefox getting closes; IE having no hope), but it did work with Mozilla on Windows. So this suggestion may be a bit premature] David to...@as... wrote: > I believe the next useful enhancement should be to make the > correspondence between LaTeX macros and HTML elements more explicit > and more configurable. There's a vote that can be construed to > support that on the feature request tracker, and I'd be interested to > hear if that would be useful to others. > > Thanks for your attention. > > -tom -- David Poole, Office: +1 (604) 822-6254 Professor, Fax: +1 (604) 822-5485 Department of Computer Science, po...@cs... University of British Columbia, http://www.cs.ubc.ca/spider/poole Vancouver, B.C., Canada V6T 1Z4 ftp://ftp.cs.ubc.ca/ftp/local/poole |