Re: [Hypercontent-users] loosing the repository

[Alex V. <al...@bi...>]

Could you also send the filesystem definition for the repository from  
the /projects/ directory in the bootstrap repository?  I'll need that  
to compare with the other files, and your repository.base property as  
well if it is referenced.

Alex

On May 15, 2007, at 10:44 PM, tom tom wrote:

> Hi Alex,
>
> How does our project-definition build.xml and
> publish.xml looks like.
>
> I can't see any nested definitions, do let us know if
> risky such items exists.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> --- Alex Vigdor <al...@bi...> wrote:
>
>>
>> On May 15, 2007, at 7:56 PM, tom tom wrote:
>>
>>> Alex,
>>>
>>> What do you mean by older version of HyperContent,
>> we
>>> use HC 2.0 with the patches which we discussed.
>>>
>>> Are you refering to HC 2.0 or HC 2.1
>>
>> It was a beta version of 2.0.  Quite some time ago.
>>
>>>
>>> If I can remember there was unnecessary publish
>> folder
>>> inside the content folders level, but am not too
>> sure.
>>
>> It is very important that you do NOT nest any other
>> declared
>> filesystems above or below your primary physical
>> repository - this
>> can lead to disastrous results if you have
>> delete="true" on your
>> publishing scripts!
>>
>> Alex
>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ---
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2
>> express and take
>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to
>> get it now.
>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hypercontent-users mailing list
>> Hyp...@li...
>>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hypercontent-users
>>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________ 
> ______________
> Bored stiff? Loosen up...
> Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
> http://games.yahoo.com/games/front
>