Re: [Hypercontent-users] Further doubts and clarifications needed

[tom t. <j_l...@ya...>]

Hi Alex,
I tried it out, here what happened.

I changed the approvals.xml


<event name="save" permissions="!approve">
<variable name="editor" value="${actor}"/>
<variable name="edition" value="${edition}"/>
<variable name="href"
value="${abs-server-base}${output-path}?edition=${edition}"/>
<variable name="editor-full-name"
value="${user-full-name}"/>
<nq who="${editor}"/>
<nq where="${path}"/>
<nq q="saved"/>
<redirect
location="${abs-server-base}${path}?mode=interactive&screen=workflow.approvals"/>
</event

Then I used the ${editor-full-name} in the
request-approval event as part of the email body,

but it does not print the variable name instead it
prints
user-full-name 

The user has given his full-name in his profile but
this has not been picked by the ${user-full-name}
variable.



Thanks,








--- Alex Vigdor <al...@bi...> wrote:

> After looking at this a little more closely, here's
> my recommendation:
> 
> 1) You must save the editor's full name in a
> variable during the save  
> event
> 
> <event name="save" permissions="!approve">
> 	<variable name="editor" value="${actor}"/>
> 	<variable name="editor-full-name"
> value="${user-full-name}"/>		
> ...
> 
> 2) Then refer to your declared variable in the later
> reminder events
> 
> <event name="email-reminder" when="in 24 hours *">
> 			<email who="group:approvers"
> subject="[HyperContent]: Reminder -  
> Approval requested" content-type="text/html">
> 					<![CDATA[
> 					<h3>${editor-full-name} requested approval for
> ...
> 
> Let me know if that helps!
> 
> Alex
> 
> On Feb 25, 2007, at 10:49 PM, tom tom wrote:
> 
> > Full Name and email address both are not empty.
> >
> > Still the problem exists.
> >
> > let me know if it works in ur enviornment.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --- Alex Vigdor <al...@bi...> wrote:
> >
> >> Make sure that in the user profile, the "Full
> Name"
> >> field is
> >> completed.  The full name is taken from the
> longer
> >> full name field at
> >> the top, is not reconstructed from the given name
> >> and family name
> >> fields.  Perhaps that's the problem?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Alex
> >>
> >> On Feb 22, 2007, at 11:09 PM, tom tom wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Alex,
> >>> I started with the item 3 that is approvals.xml
> >> fix.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I incooperate your change as follows
> >>> ...
> >>> ....
> >>> if(var.size()>=1){
> >>>                     String name = var.item(0);
> >>>
> >> if(Strings.equals(name,"actor") ||
> >>> Strings.equals(name,"user")){
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
var.set(0,Session.getUser(event.getSubject()).getName());
> >>>                     }else if
> >>> (Strings.equals(name,"user-full-name")){
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  var.set(0,event.getUser().getFullName());
> >>>
> >>>                       }
> >>>
> >>> .....
> >>> ....
> >>>
> >>> but it didnt work, if always go to the first
> block
> >>> which is  if(Strings.equals(name,"actor") ||
> >>> Strings.equals(name,"user"))
> >>>
> >>> Then what I did was inside this block instead of
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
var.set(0,Session.getUser(event.getSubject()).getName());
> >>>
> >>> I changed it to
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
var.set(0,Session.getUser(event.getSubject()).getFullName());
> >>>
> >>> Then the entire functinality didnt work.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Well my intention is to send the mail with Full
> >> Name
> >>> instead of userIds.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Let me know how to proceed on this.
> >>>
> >>> Have I done something wrong.?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --- Alex Vigdor <al...@bi...> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Feb 20, 2007, at 9:23 PM, tom tom wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I got hypercontent working with apache2.2 with
> >>>> tomcat
> >>>>> with the use of mod_jk, Hence am moving slowly
> >>>> towards
> >>>>> the production setup.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I got following doubts/questions which am not
> >> very
> >>>>> clear.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1) What is the difference between build and
> >>>> publish as
> >>>>> far as the HC life cycle is concerned. How
> >>>> build/build
> >>>>> -all differ from publish
> >>>>
> >>>> Build and publish represent a two-step
> publishing
> >>>> process: the first
> >>>> step renders the static output on a staging
> >>>> filesystem that can be
> >>>> used to review the content before it is copied
> to
> >>>> the publishing
> >>>> filesystem.  As it turns out, most people are
> >>>> perfectly happy with a
> >>>> one-step publishing workflow that renders the
> >> static
> >>>> output directly
> >>>> to the public web space.  To use this simpler
> >>>> approach, adjust the
> >>>> events in /config/workflow/publish.xml to
> >> something
> >>>> like this
> >>>>
> >>>> 	<event name="publish" permissions="publish">
> >>>> 		<variable name="publisher" value="${actor}"/>
> 
> >>>> 		<render path="${path}"
> destination="/publish/"
> >>>> force="false"
> >>>> delete="true"/>
> >>>> 		<nq who="${publisher}"/>
> >>>> 		<nq q="publishing"/>
> >>>> 	</event>
> >>>> 	
> >>>> 	<event name="publish-all"
> permissions="publish">
> >>>> 		<variable name="publisher" value="${actor}"/>
> 
> >>>> 		<render path="/" destination="/publish/"
> >>>> force="false" delete="true"/>
> >>>> 		<nq who="${publisher}"/>
> >>>> 		<nq q="publishing"/>
> >>>> 	</event>
> >>>>
> >>>> Then you can remove /config/workflow/build.xml
> >> and
> >>>> any build
> >>>> filesystem.  "/publish/" refers to your publish
> >>>> filesystem in  /
> >>>> config/project-definition.xml
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2) As I am running HC and apache in one
> >>>> machine(with
> >>>>> mod_jk) should I use build and publish at all?
> >>>> Isnt
> >>>>> author->preview->approve enough?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Initialy I thought I dont want to use but
> later
> >>>>> realize that if I dont use build and publish
> 
=== message truncated ===



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time 
with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news