Re: [Hypercontent-users] Further doubts and clarifications needed
Brought to you by:
alexvigdor
Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Hypercontent-users] Further doubts and clarifications needed
|
From: Alex V. <al...@bi...> - 2007-02-23 13:44:52
|
Make sure that in the user profile, the "Full Name" field is
completed. The full name is taken from the longer full name field at
the top, is not reconstructed from the given name and family name
fields. Perhaps that's the problem?
Cheers,
Alex
On Feb 22, 2007, at 11:09 PM, tom tom wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> I started with the item 3 that is approvals.xml fix.
>
>
> I incooperate your change as follows
> ...
> ....
> if(var.size()>=1){
> String name = var.item(0);
> if(Strings.equals(name,"actor") ||
> Strings.equals(name,"user")){
>
> var.set(0,Session.getUser(event.getSubject()).getName());
> }else if
> (Strings.equals(name,"user-full-name")){
>
>
> var.set(0,event.getUser().getFullName());
>
> }
>
> .....
> ....
>
> but it didnt work, if always go to the first block
> which is if(Strings.equals(name,"actor") ||
> Strings.equals(name,"user"))
>
> Then what I did was inside this block instead of
>
> var.set(0,Session.getUser(event.getSubject()).getName());
>
> I changed it to
>
> var.set(0,Session.getUser(event.getSubject()).getFullName());
>
> Then the entire functinality didnt work.
>
>
> Well my intention is to send the mail with Full Name
> instead of userIds.
>
>
>
> Let me know how to proceed on this.
>
> Have I done something wrong.?
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> --- Alex Vigdor <al...@bi...> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 20, 2007, at 9:23 PM, tom tom wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I got hypercontent working with apache2.2 with
>> tomcat
>>> with the use of mod_jk, Hence am moving slowly
>> towards
>>> the production setup.
>>>
>>> I got following doubts/questions which am not very
>>> clear.
>>>
>>>
>>> 1) What is the difference between build and
>> publish as
>>> far as the HC life cycle is concerned. How
>> build/build
>>> -all differ from publish
>>
>> Build and publish represent a two-step publishing
>> process: the first
>> step renders the static output on a staging
>> filesystem that can be
>> used to review the content before it is copied to
>> the publishing
>> filesystem. As it turns out, most people are
>> perfectly happy with a
>> one-step publishing workflow that renders the static
>> output directly
>> to the public web space. To use this simpler
>> approach, adjust the
>> events in /config/workflow/publish.xml to something
>> like this
>>
>> <event name="publish" permissions="publish">
>> <variable name="publisher" value="${actor}"/>
>> <render path="${path}" destination="/publish/"
>> force="false"
>> delete="true"/>
>> <nq who="${publisher}"/>
>> <nq q="publishing"/>
>> </event>
>>
>> <event name="publish-all" permissions="publish">
>> <variable name="publisher" value="${actor}"/>
>> <render path="/" destination="/publish/"
>> force="false" delete="true"/>
>> <nq who="${publisher}"/>
>> <nq q="publishing"/>
>> </event>
>>
>> Then you can remove /config/workflow/build.xml and
>> any build
>> filesystem. "/publish/" refers to your publish
>> filesystem in /
>> config/project-definition.xml
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2) As I am running HC and apache in one
>> machine(with
>>> mod_jk) should I use build and publish at all?
>> Isnt
>>> author->preview->approve enough?
>>>
>>> Initialy I thought I dont want to use but later
>>> realize that if I dont use build and publish
>> content
>>> will be served by tomcat (even with mod_jk). Due
>> to
>>> shis reason
>>> I introduced the build-url and build and publish
>> the
>>> content to apache docs folder so that static
>> content
>>> will be served directly by apache. Please let me
>> know
>>> we are on the correct track? If the build and
>> publish
>>> not required align with our configuration pls do
>> let
>>> us know?
>>
>> I suggest
>>
>> author->preview->approve->publish
>>
>> if you drop the build step as outlined above
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 3) in the Approvals.xml it refers to the ${actor}
>>> variable and assign it to a variable called author
>>>
>>> Specially when sending reminders it sends the
>> message
>>> with the uid not with the fullname.
>>> How to get the username/full name (assuming he/she
>> has
>>> updated his/her profile) within the approvals.xml
>> and
>>> send the mail accordinlgy instead of the uid(this
>> is a
>>> numeric in our case) What is the variable that I
>>> should refer within the approvals.xml to get the
>> users
>>> name.
>>
>> This isn't supported at the moment, but you could
>> implement it around
>> line 57 of
>> org.hypercontent.workflow.command.AbstractCommand
>> following the pattern there to associate a variable
>> name with the
>> results of a VCard lookup, something like
>>
>> else if(Strings.equals(name,"user-full-name")){
>> try {
>>
>> var.set(0,event.getUser().getFullName()));
>> }
>> catch(IOException e) {
>> Logger.error(e);
>> }
>> }
>>
>> Let me know if that works for you, and I can check
>> it into CVS!
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 4) As far as the UI screens are concerned I need
>> to
>>> change the name of the texts in some of the UIs
>>> specially workflow.
>>>
>>> I have seen references as follows
>>> $bundle.get("XXXXXXXXX")
>>> I just want to know where these screen text
>> constants
>>> are kept, from which property file it get loaded
>> to
>>> $bundle
>>
>> The localization files are stored in the /l10n
>> directory of the
>> bootstrap repository.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Alex
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ______________
> Cheap talk?
> Check out Yahoo! Messenger's low PC-to-Phone call rates.
> http://voice.yahoo.com
>
|
