From: Alexander S.K. <al...@be...> - 2004-06-03 17:51:40
|
=F7=E5=F2=E2=E5=F0=E3, 3 =E8=FE=ED=FF 2004 =E3. Sandro sandrorrfreire@yah= oo.com.br wrote: SRRF> Alexander SRRF> I liked very SRRF> But I would be better f_hwgprg.prg to record instead of Editbox for= GET, SRRF> because for implementatios disponible in GET command, Valid, When, = Picture, SRRF> etc. not present in edibox Yes, of course. Full support of GETs functionality will be in f_hwgprg.prg, too. Last days I concentrated mostly on reading/executing xml - data driven applications are my 'idee fixe' :). I find it very useful to have configurable forms separately of the application - to have possibility to configure them for different tasks, different users ... This is very needed, IMO, for ERP systems. We may keep forms in separate xml files, in the database of any kind, just read them and execute. =20 SRRF> The Rodrigo Moreno created the classrooms for Postgree in xHarbour = style SRRF> classes for Mysql, would be possible, to associate in the future ta= bles SRRF> forms, DBF and/or SQL. This is possible already. Regards, Alexander http://kresin.belgorod.su |