Re: [Http-webtest-general] Re: perl objects in HTTP::WebTest

[Ilya M. <il...@ip...>]

>>>>> "GF" == Gerry Finkel <ga...@cs...> writes:

GF> Illya,
GF> Sorry I haven't responded - I got sidetracked for a week. 

GF> I think it's good enough for me to know that this should be working; I
GF> assume I just have a bug in my code. I'd rather not waste your time
GF> trying to debug my code (although if you're interested, I'm quite
GF> willing to mail it all to you). 

I'm curious, so, yes, please send it me. Though I don't promise
anything :)

GF> I hadn't looked into plugins yet. Perhaps that's the way I should be
GF> going, since the more time I spend at this, the more code I write in the
GF> on_response hook. I guess that's where I'll head now...

Too much code in on_response hooks is definetely bad smell and moving
it in plugins is definetely better idea. The reason is simple: plugins
are ordinary Perl modules so it is easier to reuse and test this code.

-- 
Ilya Martynov,  il...@ip...
CTO IPonWEB (UK) Ltd
Quality Perl Programming and Unix Support
UK managed @ offshore prices - http://www.iponweb.net
Personal website - http://martynov.org