Re: [Htmlvalidator-help] validator, tag case
Brought to you by:
mgueury
From: Dave F. <dfr...@ho...> - 2006-07-28 02:40:59
|
Hi: I am going to set up a VM to try and build your code. Can you tell me what version of mozilla you are compiling and what = compiler you are using - VC6 or VS2003 ? or better yet - is there a set of instructions you use to set up a = compile environment on XP -SP2 someplace on the web that you use ?? Thanks, Dave ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Marc Gueury=20 To: Stef Nychka=20 Cc: HTML Validator=20 Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 2:42 AM Subject: Re: [Htmlvalidator-help] validator, tag case Hi Stef, Both algorithm are HTML/XHTML validator. - Tidy - SGML parser The problem is that both can contains bugs. I can not solve bugs = without seeing them. I need a testcase to reproduce them. I think that the issue is that = Tidy probably detect=20 your page as HTML not XHTML. For the SGML parser =3D the same validator than validator.w3c.org that = I am sure=20 takes care of the uppercase tags or not.=20 For Tidy, I am not sure. Marc Stef Nychka wrote:=20 ----------Original Message---------- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:44:19 +0200 From: Marc Gueury <mg...@sk...> To: Stef Nychka <st...@ug...> Cc: HTML Validator <htm...@li...> Subject: Re: validator, tag case Hi Stef, HTML allows uppercase tags. Not XHTML. It could be that tidy has a bug about it or that the DTD is not well defined in your case. What means that the XHTML/HTML detection works differently for both program. =20 Yes, the document I was validating was XHTML 1.0. So it sounds like you're saying that your validator only validates HTML, not XHTML. Is this correct? I need a testcase to log such a bug in Tidy and to see if it is really a bug. =20 The file is XHTML. Do you still want an XHTML document with <ol> that your validator let's slide? (Note: I doubt it'll be a problem, but there's a small possibility that I may not be able to reproduce it.) Hope it helps, Marc Ps: Please read this: = http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html =20 I glanced at it, and noted that it's an HTML, not an XHTML validator. Although it did say something about XHTML help. Anway, was there something in particular you wanted me to look at? Or were you saying this beta version may work better? I wouldn't mind testing it out, at least on that one file, although I'll likely stick with the stable version for now. Stef Nychka wrote: <snipped> Cheers =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- = -------------------------------------------------------------------------= Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to = share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn = cash = http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D= DEVDEV -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- _______________________________________________ Htmlvalidator-help mailing list Htm...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlvalidator-help |