Re: [Htmlvalidator-help] validator, tag case
Brought to you by:
mgueury
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-07-25 06:42:32
|
Hi Stef, Both algorithm are HTML/XHTML validator. - Tidy - SGML parser The problem is that both can contains bugs. I can not solve bugs without seeing them. I need a testcase to reproduce them. I think that the issue is that Tidy probably detect your page as HTML not XHTML. For the SGML parser = the same validator than validator.w3c.org that I am sure takes care of the uppercase tags or not. For Tidy, I am not sure. Marc Stef Nychka wrote: > ----------Original Message---------- > > >> Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:44:19 +0200 >> From: Marc Gueury <mg...@sk...> >> To: Stef Nychka <st...@ug...> >> Cc: HTML Validator <htm...@li...> >> Subject: Re: validator, tag case >> >> Hi Stef, >> >> HTML allows uppercase tags. Not XHTML. It could be that >> tidy has a bug about it or that the DTD is not well >> defined in your case. What means that the XHTML/HTML >> detection works differently for both program. >> > > Yes, the document I was validating was XHTML 1.0. So it > sounds like you're saying that your validator only validates > HTML, not XHTML. Is this correct? > > >> I need a testcase to log such a bug in Tidy and to see if >> it is really a bug. >> >> > > The file is XHTML. Do you still want an XHTML document with > <ol> that your validator let's slide? (Note: I doubt it'll > be a problem, but there's a small possibility that I may not > be able to reproduce it.) > > >> Hope it helps, >> >> Marc >> >> Ps: Please read this: http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html >> >> > > I glanced at it, and noted that it's an HTML, not an XHTML > validator. Although it did say something about XHTML help. > Anway, was there something in particular you wanted me to > look at? Or were you saying this beta version may work > better? I wouldn't mind testing it out, at least on that > one file, although I'll likely stick with the stable version > for now. > > >> Stef Nychka wrote: >> > <snipped> > > Cheers > > |