[Htmlvalidator-help] Re: Flock and HTML Validator

[Marc G. <mg...@sk...>]

Thanks, I will include it in the next version 0.8x.

Marc

Stewart James wrote:
> Yeah that was the only change.
>
> I've attached the install.rdf for you to look at - it's pretty obvious
> where I pasted in the tag for the flock product.
>
> On the wiki (where I got the tag information) they ask extension devs to
> let them know if their extension works with flock (ex...@fl...).
> It's your hard work that delivers the extension, so I reckon you should
> have the joy of letting them know HTML Validator works with flock :)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Stewart
>
> ________________________________________
> From: Marc Gueury [mailto:mg...@sk...] 
> Sent: Friday, 26 May 2006 7:35 AM
> To: Stewart James
> Subject: Re: Flock and HTML Validator
>
> Hi Stewart,
>
> Sure, can you give me the install.rdf file that you changed ? If it is
> just a matter of this,
> I will add it in the next version of the extension. I supppose that you
> just added the tag for the 
> Flock product right ?
>
> Thanks by advance,
>
> Marc
>
>
> Stewart James wrote: 
> Wow no pain at all and seems to work.
>
> I remembered reading somewhere once that XPI's are zip files, so before
> I started compiling I thought I would have a look inside one of your
> already compiled versions for windows (0.7.9).
>
> Noticed the install.rdf file and realised this is the place where sanity
> checks are defined for what the browser will support.
>
> I figured if that's all it is flock must have some docs on it:
> http://extend.flock.com/ had a link to
> http://wiki.flock.com/index.php?title=Modify_Firefox_Extensions
>
> A quick cut and paste and re-zip, and installation was a success, so
> far, I don't know what testing you do for your released, it is running
> fine.
>
> Simple.
>
> Now I know it looks like a simple added section to the install.rdf,
> would you consider adding it to the standard FF build you do?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Stewart
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Gueury [mailto:mg...@sk...] 
> Sent: Thursday, 25 May 2006 5:12 PM
> To: Stewart James
> Subject: Re: Flock and HTML Validator
>
> Hi Stewart,
>
> I do not know flock at all.
> I write this extension during my freetime and it is conflicting a lot 
> with private events.
> So, if you want to help to make it compatible with flock, you are
> welcome.
>
> http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/compile.html
>
> What do you like in Flock ?
>
> Marc
>
> Stewart James wrote:
>   
> Hi,
>
> I feel quite rude asking you such a question, but, I have found HTML
> Validator invaluable for checking on other peoples work as well as my
> own.
>
> I recently decided to give flock another look (I really hope this has
> caught your attention, if not check out flock.com). Last time I looked
> it was only 0.2, not at 0.5* and it seems to have hit me in the write
> spot. The sad part is, although it is based on firefox, not all
> extensions work - yours is one of the ones that doesn't.
>
> As it is based on firefox would you have any intention of releasing
>     
> HTML
>   
> validator so it can install and work on flock?
>
> At any rate thanks for your work on the add-on itself: makes it so
>     
> easy
>   
> to fast check your not straying from the w3 path.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Stewart
>
>
>
>
>   
>     
>
>
>
>
>   
>
>