Thread: [Htmlvalidator-help] Re: html validator
Brought to you by:
mgueury
Menu
▾
▴
htmlvalidator-help
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-05-29 23:13:24
|
Hi Dago, Can you please try the version 0.791 ? You can find it here: http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/download.html And retry the hanging action in EBay ? I am really interested by the result. If it does not work, please give me the steps to reproduce the issue. Thanks, Marc _D...@we... wrote: > Hey All, > > find a problem with html validator. My firefox 1.5.0.3 hangs up, when I visit an ebay site. Without html validator there is no problem. You will find the logfiles attached. > > Greetings > Dago > |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-07-18 23:07:08
|
Hi Jorge, This is a bug in tidy that I never find back the right number, but that you can find here http://tidy.sf.net/ if you look in the bugs. To see the error you speak about here, maybe try the 0.8x beta that you can find here: http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html The beta is really stable. It is a beta until that all features are frozen. Marc Ps: CC to the mailing list. Jorge Blazquez wrote: > Hi Mark, > > I've been using the HTML Validator extension for Firefox for quite a > lot. I find it a fantastic feature, so thanks fro doing it :-) > It's always great to see the green mark at the bottom right of the > page ;-) > > Bu today I was expecting a red mark to appear and I got the green > check mark, which surprised me. I had an invalid html page but HTML > Tidy was telling me it was all ok. Since I know it's very rare that's > a bug, i guess maybe i have'nt configured it right. > > Here's the html code i'm testing: > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="es" xml:lang="es"> > <head> > <title>PRUEBA</title> > </head> > <body> > <dl> > <dt>skkdkjd > <dd>lllllll > </dl> </body> > </html> > > Since I'm using XHTML it should point errors since the dt and dd > element's aren't closed. (btw, I'm using version 0.7.9.3) > > Thanks for your time > > Jorge > > |
|
From: Jorge B. <JOR...@te...> - 2006-07-19 17:27:49
|
Hi Marc, i tried the beta but still get the green mark of valid xhtml. I've been=20 looking for the bug number but haven't found it. By the way, the beta looks really nice Regards Jorge Marc Gueury escribi=F3: > Hi Jorge, > > This is a bug in tidy that I never find back the right number, but=20 > that you can find > here http://tidy.sf.net/ if you look in the bugs. > > To see the error you speak about here, maybe try the 0.8x beta that=20 > you can > find here: > > http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html > > The beta is really stable. It is a beta until that all features are=20 > frozen. > > Marc > > Ps: CC to the mailing list. > > > Jorge Blazquez wrote: >> Hi Mark, >> >> I've been using the HTML Validator extension for Firefox for quite a=20 >> lot. I find it a fantastic feature, so thanks fro doing it :-) >> It's always great to see the green mark at the bottom right of the=20 >> page ;-) >> >> Bu today I was expecting a red mark to appear and I got the green=20 >> check mark, which surprised me. I had an invalid html page but HTML=20 >> Tidy was telling me it was all ok. Since I know it's very rare that's=20 >> a bug, i guess maybe i have'nt configured it right. >> >> Here's the html code i'm testing: >> >> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" >> "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> >> <html xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang=3D"es" xml:lang=3D"e= s"> >> <head> >> <title>PRUEBA</title> >> </head> >> <body> >> <dl> >> <dt>skkdkjd >> <dd>lllllll >> </dl> </body> >> </html> >> >> Since I'm using XHTML it should point errors since the dt and dd=20 >> element's aren't closed. (btw, I'm using version 0.7.9.3) >> >> Thanks for your time >> >> Jorge >> >> > |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-07-19 18:46:17
|
Hi Jorge, Are you sure that you use the SGML parser ? It is in the options. Please read this too:=20 http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/user_guide.html#Tidy_vs_SGML_parse= r_ Marc Jorge Blazquez wrote: > Hi Marc, > > i tried the beta but still get the green mark of valid xhtml. I've been= =20 > looking for the bug number but haven't found it. > By the way, the beta looks really nice > > Regards > Jorge > > Marc Gueury escribi=F3: > =20 >> Hi Jorge, >> >> This is a bug in tidy that I never find back the right number, but=20 >> that you can find >> here http://tidy.sf.net/ if you look in the bugs. >> >> To see the error you speak about here, maybe try the 0.8x beta that=20 >> you can >> find here: >> >> http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html >> >> The beta is really stable. It is a beta until that all features are=20 >> frozen. >> >> Marc >> >> Ps: CC to the mailing list. >> >> >> Jorge Blazquez wrote: >> =20 >>> Hi Mark, >>> >>> I've been using the HTML Validator extension for Firefox for quite a=20 >>> lot. I find it a fantastic feature, so thanks fro doing it :-) >>> It's always great to see the green mark at the bottom right of the=20 >>> page ;-) >>> >>> Bu today I was expecting a red mark to appear and I got the green=20 >>> check mark, which surprised me. I had an invalid html page but HTML=20 >>> Tidy was telling me it was all ok. Since I know it's very rare that's= =20 >>> a bug, i guess maybe i have'nt configured it right. >>> >>> Here's the html code i'm testing: >>> >>> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" >>> "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> >>> <html xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang=3D"es" xml:lang=3D"= es"> >>> <head> >>> <title>PRUEBA</title> >>> </head> >>> <body> >>> <dl> >>> <dt>skkdkjd >>> <dd>lllllll >>> </dl> </body> >>> </html> >>> >>> Since I'm using XHTML it should point errors since the dt and dd=20 >>> element's aren't closed. (btw, I'm using version 0.7.9.3) >>> >>> Thanks for your time >>> >>> Jorge >>> >>> >>> =20 > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share= your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D= DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Htmlvalidator-help mailing list > Htm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlvalidator-help > > > > =20 |
|
From: Jorge B. <JOR...@te...> - 2006-07-19 20:23:01
|
Yes, i had the Tidy Algorithm. With the SGML Algorithm option it shows=20
the error.
It outlines these errors:
line 10 column 7 - Error: document type does not allow element "dd" here
line 11 column 7 - Error: end tag for "dd" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was=20
specified
line 10 column 4 - Info: start tag was here
line 11 column 7 - Error: end tag for "dt" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was=20
specified
line 9 column 4 - Info: start tag was here
which it what it was expected according to the info on the link you told =
me:
" OpenJade, the SGML parser, has the following advantages:
* It is the same algorithm that the http://validator.w3.org=20
<http://validator.w3.org>
* So, it gives the same errors than the W3c validator. This can be
important if you want or need to have your pages W3c compliants.
* It is based on DTDs: a language that defines the HTML syntax.
There are a lot of SGML DTDs for ex, several types or versions of
HTML, SVG or MathML, ...
* It gives better result for Strict HTML or XHTML validations."
Thanks for the info, Marc.
Regards
Jorge
Marc Gueury escribi=F3:
> Hi Jorge,
>
> Are you sure that you use the SGML parser ?
> It is in the options.
>
> Please read this too:=20
> http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/user_guide.html#Tidy_vs_SGML_par=
ser_
>
> Marc
>
> Jorge Blazquez wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> i tried the beta but still get the green mark of valid xhtml. I've bee=
n=20
>> looking for the bug number but haven't found it.
>> By the way, the beta looks really nice
>>
>> Regards
>> Jorge
>>
>> Marc Gueury escribi=F3:
>> =20
>>> Hi Jorge,
>>>
>>> This is a bug in tidy that I never find back the right number, but=20
>>> that you can find
>>> here http://tidy.sf.net/ if you look in the bugs.
>>>
>>> To see the error you speak about here, maybe try the 0.8x beta that=20
>>> you can
>>> find here:
>>>
>>> http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html
>>>
>>> The beta is really stable. It is a beta until that all features are=20
>>> frozen.
>>>
>>> Marc
>>>
>>> Ps: CC to the mailing list.
>>>
>>>
>>> Jorge Blazquez wrote:
>>> =20
>>>> Hi Mark,
>>>>
>>>> I've been using the HTML Validator extension for Firefox for quite a=
=20
>>>> lot. I find it a fantastic feature, so thanks fro doing it :-)
>>>> It's always great to see the green mark at the bottom right of the=20
>>>> page ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Bu today I was expecting a red mark to appear and I got the green=20
>>>> check mark, which surprised me. I had an invalid html page but HTML=20
>>>> Tidy was telling me it was all ok. Since I know it's very rare that'=
s=20
>>>> a bug, i guess maybe i have'nt configured it right.
>>>>
>>>> Here's the html code i'm testing:
>>>>
>>>> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
>>>> "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
>>>> <html xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang=3D"es" xml:lang=3D=
"es">
>>>> <head>
>>>> <title>PRUEBA</title>
>>>> </head>
>>>> <body>
>>>> <dl>
>>>> <dt>skkdkjd
>>>> <dd>lllllll
>>>> </dl> </body>
>>>> </html>
>>>>
>>>> Since I'm using XHTML it should point errors since the dt and dd=20
>>>> element's aren't closed. (btw, I'm using version 0.7.9.3)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your time
>>>>
>>>> Jorge
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> =20
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------=
---
>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to shar=
e your
>> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cas=
h
>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=
=3DDEVDEV
>> _______________________________________________
>> Htmlvalidator-help mailing list
>> Htm...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlvalidator-help
>>
>>
>>
>> =20
>
|
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2007-02-21 18:30:42
|
Hi Seb, First, thanks for reporting the problem ! This domain list feature has been rewritten with new Firefox 1.5 API in the extension 0.837 (rc2). Currently not available. It will be available as soon as the shell of sourceforge is back working. https://sourceforge.net/docs/A04 It will be available here: http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/index.html Hope it helps, Marc sp...@lf... wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm a user or your wonderfull extension for firefox. > I found a very little bug about options : > > "Browser, Validate page in only the domains" > > if I wrote several domains, separated by commas but I put by error a > space > between coma and domain, the domain is ignored. > > not critical, but I was a little bit disapointed .... > > Your extension remains great, in a word thanks for your work !! > > Seb > Si vous n'etes pas destinataires de ce message, merci d'avertir > l'expediteur de l'erreur de distribution et de le detruire immediatement. > Ce message contient des informations confidentielles ou appartenant a > La Francaise des Jeux. Il est etabli a l'intention exclusive de ses > destinataires. Toute divulgation, utilisation, diffusion ou > reproduction (totale ou partielle) de ce message ou des informations > qu'il contient, doit etre prealablement autorisee. > Tout message electronique est susceptible d'alteration et son > integrite ne peut etre assuree. La Francaise des Jeux decline toute > responsabilite au titre de ce message s'il a ete modifie ou falsifie. > > If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify > the sender of the wrong delivery and delete it immediately from your > system. > This e-mail contains confidential information or information belonging > to La Francaise des Jeux and is intended solely for the addressees. > The unauthorised disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either > whole or partial) of this e-mail, or any information it contains, is > prohibited. > E-mails are susceptible to alteration and their integrity cannot be > guaranteed. La Francaise des Jeux shall not be liable for this e-mail > if modified or falsified. > |
×
Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X