Hi Mathias,
Can you try something for me ? Can you do the same test but with Firefox=20
2.0.0.1 that you download from www.mozilla.org ?
The problem is that sometimes, some distributions decides to change some=20
random compile flag used to compile Firefox or remove XPCOM. What is=20
causing issues like the one you are experience now.
This would be really helpful for me since you are not the only person=20
reporting this problem.
Thanks by advance,
Marc
Mathias Brodala wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Marc Gueury, 17.01.2007 21:23:
> =20
>> It is Linux right ? It happened since 2.0.0.1 and with 2.0.0.0 ? And i=
t
>> was working with previous versions of Firefox.
>>
>> Can you give me
>> - your precise OS and distribution
>> =20
>
> Debian Unstable aka Sid.
>
> =20
>> - as well as where the browser come from (downloaded from
>> www.mozilla.org) or from a RPM packaging ? from the distribution ?
>> =20
>
> Yes, the package is from the official Debian repository.
>
> =20
>> - was it working before 2.0.0.1
>> =20
>
> It was.
>
> =20
>> I think we need ti log a bug in bugzilla.mozilla.org. I think the base
>> problem is inside mozilla code.
>> My 0.795 code did not changed for the 2.0. upgrade just the way to cal=
l
>> the view source was different.
>> =20
>
> Then that could be the crux of the matter. I=E2=80=99m not using Firefo=
x that often but
> it would be very good if you and/or the Mozilla devs could fix this.
>
>
> Regards, Mathias
>
> =20
|
