htmlvalidator-help Mailing List for HTML Validator for Mozilla and Firefox (Page 8)
Brought to you by:
mgueury
Menu
▾
▴
htmlvalidator-help — Help for HTML Validator extension for Firefox
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(65) |
Jun
(52) |
Jul
(33) |
Aug
(33) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 |
Jan
(48) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(25) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-08-05 21:29:36
|
Thanks Denny, I will update the site. Marc Denny de la Haye wrote: > Hi... I have an update for your FAQ / lib error pages. In addition to > your instructions for FC4: > > On Fedora Core 4: > Solution: you need to install the compat-libstdc++ package (yum install > compat-libstdc++-33) > > > Here are instructions for FC5: > > On Fedora Core 5: > Solution: you need to install two compat-libstdc++ packages (yum install > compat-libstdc++-296 compat-libstdc++-33) > > > Regards, > Denny > > |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-07-28 21:24:00
|
Hi Adam, The problem is that there are a lot of users of the extensions that a lot of them have install question. And it is too complex for most of them to understand that it needs reinstalling twice :-) The result is that I am flood by mail about Netscape 8.x, 7.x and so on where it really does not work. Whatever, thank you for that remark. I cc it to the mailing-list for archiving. I will also try to update the website. But I would like to try it first. And maybe to solve the installation issue. Marc Adam Pilorz wrote: > Hello, > > You have written on HTML Validator extension's web page, that it > doesn't work with SeaMonkey. On the other hand, I'm using this > extension in SeaMonkey for months. The only problem is, it needs > double-installing. I installed the Fx/Windows wersion, restarted > browser, the extension have reported a bug, then I reinstalled > extension once again and restarted browser, and it have worked fine > since then. > > Hope this information is useful, best regards, Adam Pilorz. > |
|
From: Stef N. <st...@ug...> - 2006-07-28 20:12:28
|
----------Original Message---------- > Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 08:42:12 +0200 > From: Marc Gueury <mg...@sk...> > <snipped> > > The problem is that both can contains bugs. I can not > solve bugs without seeing them. I need a testcase to > reproduce them. <snipped> Hey. You can use http://ugweb.cs.ualberta.ca/~stef/index.shtml (The problem's at the first and only <OL>. The Tidy-based validator doesn't flag this as invalid, but http://validator.w3.org/ does.) I'm _assuming_ that taking a valid xhtml file and changing any tag to uppercase will result in a test case. Cheers -- Stef Nychka, Lab Instructor [st...@ug...] Office: Ath 2-04; Phone (49)2-5654 Dept. of Computing Science, University of Alberta |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-07-28 17:47:46
|
Hi Dave, These instructions are not too bad for Mozilla. http://gemal.dk/mozilla/build.html I use Firefox 1.5 beta to build the code with VC6. I do not have VS2003. But the VC2005 is free and I will maybe use it one day. The compile instruction for the extension are here: http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/compile.html Marc Dave Frazzitta wrote: > Hi: > > I am going to set up a VM to try and build your code. > Can you tell me what version of mozilla you are compiling and what > compiler you are using - VC6 or VS2003 ? > or better yet - is there a set of instructions you use to set up a > compile environment on XP -SP2 someplace on the web that you use ?? > > Thanks, Dave > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Marc Gueury <mailto:mg...@sk...> > *To:* Stef Nychka <mailto:st...@ug...> > *Cc:* HTML Validator > <mailto:htm...@li...> > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 25, 2006 2:42 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Htmlvalidator-help] validator, tag case > > Hi Stef, > > Both algorithm are HTML/XHTML validator. > - Tidy > - SGML parser > > The problem is that both can contains bugs. I can not solve bugs > without seeing them. > I need a testcase to reproduce them. I think that the issue is > that Tidy probably detect > your page as HTML not XHTML. > > For the SGML parser = the same validator than validator.w3c.org > that I am sure > takes care of the uppercase tags or not. > For Tidy, I am not sure. > > Marc > > > Stef Nychka wrote: >> ----------Original Message---------- >> >> >>> Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:44:19 +0200 >>> From: Marc Gueury <mg...@sk...> >>> To: Stef Nychka <st...@ug...> >>> Cc: HTML Validator <htm...@li...> >>> Subject: Re: validator, tag case >>> >>> Hi Stef, >>> >>> HTML allows uppercase tags. Not XHTML. It could be that >>> tidy has a bug about it or that the DTD is not well >>> defined in your case. What means that the XHTML/HTML >>> detection works differently for both program. >>> >> >> Yes, the document I was validating was XHTML 1.0. So it >> sounds like you're saying that your validator only validates >> HTML, not XHTML. Is this correct? >> >> >>> I need a testcase to log such a bug in Tidy and to see if >>> it is really a bug. >>> >>> >> >> The file is XHTML. Do you still want an XHTML document with >> <ol> that your validator let's slide? (Note: I doubt it'll >> be a problem, but there's a small possibility that I may not >> be able to reproduce it.) >> >> >>> Hope it helps, >>> >>> Marc >>> >>> Ps: Please read this: http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html >>> >>> >> >> I glanced at it, and noted that it's an HTML, not an XHTML >> validator. Although it did say something about XHTML help. >> Anway, was there something in particular you wanted me to >> look at? Or were you saying this beta version may work >> better? I wouldn't mind testing it out, at least on that >> one file, although I'll likely stick with the stable version >> for now. >> >> >>> Stef Nychka wrote: >>> >> <snipped> >> >> Cheers >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to > share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn > cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Htmlvalidator-help mailing list > Htm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlvalidator-help > |
|
From: Dave F. <dfr...@ho...> - 2006-07-28 02:40:59
|
Hi: I am going to set up a VM to try and build your code. Can you tell me what version of mozilla you are compiling and what = compiler you are using - VC6 or VS2003 ? or better yet - is there a set of instructions you use to set up a = compile environment on XP -SP2 someplace on the web that you use ?? Thanks, Dave ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Marc Gueury=20 To: Stef Nychka=20 Cc: HTML Validator=20 Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 2:42 AM Subject: Re: [Htmlvalidator-help] validator, tag case Hi Stef, Both algorithm are HTML/XHTML validator. - Tidy - SGML parser The problem is that both can contains bugs. I can not solve bugs = without seeing them. I need a testcase to reproduce them. I think that the issue is that = Tidy probably detect=20 your page as HTML not XHTML. For the SGML parser =3D the same validator than validator.w3c.org that = I am sure=20 takes care of the uppercase tags or not.=20 For Tidy, I am not sure. Marc Stef Nychka wrote:=20 ----------Original Message---------- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:44:19 +0200 From: Marc Gueury <mg...@sk...> To: Stef Nychka <st...@ug...> Cc: HTML Validator <htm...@li...> Subject: Re: validator, tag case Hi Stef, HTML allows uppercase tags. Not XHTML. It could be that tidy has a bug about it or that the DTD is not well defined in your case. What means that the XHTML/HTML detection works differently for both program. =20 Yes, the document I was validating was XHTML 1.0. So it sounds like you're saying that your validator only validates HTML, not XHTML. Is this correct? I need a testcase to log such a bug in Tidy and to see if it is really a bug. =20 The file is XHTML. Do you still want an XHTML document with <ol> that your validator let's slide? (Note: I doubt it'll be a problem, but there's a small possibility that I may not be able to reproduce it.) Hope it helps, Marc Ps: Please read this: = http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html =20 I glanced at it, and noted that it's an HTML, not an XHTML validator. Although it did say something about XHTML help. Anway, was there something in particular you wanted me to look at? Or were you saying this beta version may work better? I wouldn't mind testing it out, at least on that one file, although I'll likely stick with the stable version for now. Stef Nychka wrote: <snipped> Cheers =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- = -------------------------------------------------------------------------= Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to = share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn = cash = http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D= DEVDEV -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ----- _______________________________________________ Htmlvalidator-help mailing list Htm...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlvalidator-help |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-07-25 06:42:32
|
Hi Stef, Both algorithm are HTML/XHTML validator. - Tidy - SGML parser The problem is that both can contains bugs. I can not solve bugs without seeing them. I need a testcase to reproduce them. I think that the issue is that Tidy probably detect your page as HTML not XHTML. For the SGML parser = the same validator than validator.w3c.org that I am sure takes care of the uppercase tags or not. For Tidy, I am not sure. Marc Stef Nychka wrote: > ----------Original Message---------- > > >> Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:44:19 +0200 >> From: Marc Gueury <mg...@sk...> >> To: Stef Nychka <st...@ug...> >> Cc: HTML Validator <htm...@li...> >> Subject: Re: validator, tag case >> >> Hi Stef, >> >> HTML allows uppercase tags. Not XHTML. It could be that >> tidy has a bug about it or that the DTD is not well >> defined in your case. What means that the XHTML/HTML >> detection works differently for both program. >> > > Yes, the document I was validating was XHTML 1.0. So it > sounds like you're saying that your validator only validates > HTML, not XHTML. Is this correct? > > >> I need a testcase to log such a bug in Tidy and to see if >> it is really a bug. >> >> > > The file is XHTML. Do you still want an XHTML document with > <ol> that your validator let's slide? (Note: I doubt it'll > be a problem, but there's a small possibility that I may not > be able to reproduce it.) > > >> Hope it helps, >> >> Marc >> >> Ps: Please read this: http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html >> >> > > I glanced at it, and noted that it's an HTML, not an XHTML > validator. Although it did say something about XHTML help. > Anway, was there something in particular you wanted me to > look at? Or were you saying this beta version may work > better? I wouldn't mind testing it out, at least on that > one file, although I'll likely stick with the stable version > for now. > > >> Stef Nychka wrote: >> > <snipped> > > Cheers > > |
|
From: Stef N. <st...@ug...> - 2006-07-24 20:19:29
|
----------Original Message---------- > Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 20:44:19 +0200 > From: Marc Gueury <mg...@sk...> > To: Stef Nychka <st...@ug...> > Cc: HTML Validator <htm...@li...> > Subject: Re: validator, tag case > > Hi Stef, > > HTML allows uppercase tags. Not XHTML. It could be that > tidy has a bug about it or that the DTD is not well > defined in your case. What means that the XHTML/HTML > detection works differently for both program. Yes, the document I was validating was XHTML 1.0. So it sounds like you're saying that your validator only validates HTML, not XHTML. Is this correct? > > I need a testcase to log such a bug in Tidy and to see if > it is really a bug. > The file is XHTML. Do you still want an XHTML document with <ol> that your validator let's slide? (Note: I doubt it'll be a problem, but there's a small possibility that I may not be able to reproduce it.) > Hope it helps, > > Marc > > Ps: Please read this: http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html > I glanced at it, and noted that it's an HTML, not an XHTML validator. Although it did say something about XHTML help. Anway, was there something in particular you wanted me to look at? Or were you saying this beta version may work better? I wouldn't mind testing it out, at least on that one file, although I'll likely stick with the stable version for now. > Stef Nychka wrote: >> <snipped> Cheers -- Stef Nychka, Lab Instructor [st...@ug...] Office: Ath 2-04; Phone (49)2-5654 Dept. of Computing Science, University of Alberta |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-07-23 22:55:50
|
Hi Mah-jong, No, there is not such possibility now. It would maybe be better with a button in the options. In the meanwhile, you can look here: http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/user_guide.html#Tidy_vs_SGML_parse= r_ Marc Mah-jong Montr=E9al wrote: > Wonderful extension! > > But I miss the window that appears only once, at installation, and=20 > explains the pro and cons of both, Tidy and SGML, algorithms. It shoul= d=20 > always be available in Options... , especially when choosing or switch=20 > from one to the other. > > Is there a way I could trick the extension (manually with about:config?= )=20 > to display this window again, like on install? > > Have an happy day! > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share= your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D= DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Htmlvalidator-help mailing list > Htm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlvalidator-help > > > =20 |
|
From: <mah...@ho...> - 2006-07-23 21:23:00
|
Wonderful extension! But I miss the window that appears only once, at installation, and explains the pro and cons of both, Tidy and SGML, algorithms. It should always be available in Options... , especially when choosing or switch from one to the other. Is there a way I could trick the extension (manually with about:config?) to display this window again, like on install? Have an happy day! |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-07-21 17:46:46
|
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-07-21 17:46:16
|
Hi all, I release 2 new versions 0.794 and 0.831. See the releases notes <http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/release_note.html> for more info. For 0.831, - there is mostly the fixes of Tibor. - a new window just after the installation - it is compatible with firefox 2.0 beta 1 In my wish list before prod, I would like to have a mode - for running the SGML parser - then, if there is no error, run Tidy - then if still no error/warning - show the green flag The line numbering works better but is not perfect. I still have no perfect solution for it. I think to remove it ? Or maybe to disable it by default ? Marc |
|
From: Ron <fef...@sb...> - 2006-07-20 18:43:16
|
Using Kanotix (Debian SID, somewhat based on Knoppix) The HTML Validator
extention was working fine until recently. After checking Marc's
CyberHome page, I got the following:
rp@knx:~/.mozilla/firefox/evc3to3e.default/extensions/{3b56bcc7-54e5-44a2-9b44-66c3ef58c13e}/components$
ldd libnstidy.so
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000)
libplds4.so => /usr/lib/libplds4.so (0xb7f5b000)
libplc4.so => /usr/lib/libplc4.so (0xb7f56000)
libnspr4.so => /usr/lib/libnspr4.so (0xb7f23000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 (0xb7ef9000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0xb7ef5000)
libstdc++.so.5 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.5 (0xb7e3b000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0xb7e14000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xb7e09000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0xb7cd1000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x80000000)
I'm not sure how to proceed, any ideas?
Thanks,
Ron
|
|
From: Jorge B. <JOR...@te...> - 2006-07-19 20:23:01
|
Yes, i had the Tidy Algorithm. With the SGML Algorithm option it shows=20
the error.
It outlines these errors:
line 10 column 7 - Error: document type does not allow element "dd" here
line 11 column 7 - Error: end tag for "dd" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was=20
specified
line 10 column 4 - Info: start tag was here
line 11 column 7 - Error: end tag for "dt" omitted, but OMITTAG NO was=20
specified
line 9 column 4 - Info: start tag was here
which it what it was expected according to the info on the link you told =
me:
" OpenJade, the SGML parser, has the following advantages:
* It is the same algorithm that the http://validator.w3.org=20
<http://validator.w3.org>
* So, it gives the same errors than the W3c validator. This can be
important if you want or need to have your pages W3c compliants.
* It is based on DTDs: a language that defines the HTML syntax.
There are a lot of SGML DTDs for ex, several types or versions of
HTML, SVG or MathML, ...
* It gives better result for Strict HTML or XHTML validations."
Thanks for the info, Marc.
Regards
Jorge
Marc Gueury escribi=F3:
> Hi Jorge,
>
> Are you sure that you use the SGML parser ?
> It is in the options.
>
> Please read this too:=20
> http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/user_guide.html#Tidy_vs_SGML_par=
ser_
>
> Marc
>
> Jorge Blazquez wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> i tried the beta but still get the green mark of valid xhtml. I've bee=
n=20
>> looking for the bug number but haven't found it.
>> By the way, the beta looks really nice
>>
>> Regards
>> Jorge
>>
>> Marc Gueury escribi=F3:
>> =20
>>> Hi Jorge,
>>>
>>> This is a bug in tidy that I never find back the right number, but=20
>>> that you can find
>>> here http://tidy.sf.net/ if you look in the bugs.
>>>
>>> To see the error you speak about here, maybe try the 0.8x beta that=20
>>> you can
>>> find here:
>>>
>>> http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html
>>>
>>> The beta is really stable. It is a beta until that all features are=20
>>> frozen.
>>>
>>> Marc
>>>
>>> Ps: CC to the mailing list.
>>>
>>>
>>> Jorge Blazquez wrote:
>>> =20
>>>> Hi Mark,
>>>>
>>>> I've been using the HTML Validator extension for Firefox for quite a=
=20
>>>> lot. I find it a fantastic feature, so thanks fro doing it :-)
>>>> It's always great to see the green mark at the bottom right of the=20
>>>> page ;-)
>>>>
>>>> Bu today I was expecting a red mark to appear and I got the green=20
>>>> check mark, which surprised me. I had an invalid html page but HTML=20
>>>> Tidy was telling me it was all ok. Since I know it's very rare that'=
s=20
>>>> a bug, i guess maybe i have'nt configured it right.
>>>>
>>>> Here's the html code i'm testing:
>>>>
>>>> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
>>>> "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
>>>> <html xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang=3D"es" xml:lang=3D=
"es">
>>>> <head>
>>>> <title>PRUEBA</title>
>>>> </head>
>>>> <body>
>>>> <dl>
>>>> <dt>skkdkjd
>>>> <dd>lllllll
>>>> </dl> </body>
>>>> </html>
>>>>
>>>> Since I'm using XHTML it should point errors since the dt and dd=20
>>>> element's aren't closed. (btw, I'm using version 0.7.9.3)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your time
>>>>
>>>> Jorge
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> =20
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------=
---
>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
>> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to shar=
e your
>> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cas=
h
>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=
=3DDEVDEV
>> _______________________________________________
>> Htmlvalidator-help mailing list
>> Htm...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlvalidator-help
>>
>>
>>
>> =20
>
|
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-07-19 19:38:56
|
Hi Paul, This is due to the XPCOM registry (or what ever name it is called ) When you install a XPCOM library (= it is a DLL with some custom function), the DLL has some functions that are declared in another file ( a XPT ) file. During the installation time, the XPT file is registered in the XPCOM registry so that Mozilla know where is the tidy dll, what are the functions/parameter and so on. When copying the profile, you did not copy the XPCOM registry (that is meanless, you can not do it anyway). So that when you started Firefox the library was not found. Or more exactly, the library definition in the XPCOM registry was not found. And you got this error message. There is nothing to do about this for me. Maybe you can try to log a bug in Firefox to explain it. Marc Paul Hickman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have been using your 0.83 beta version of the extension for some > time now without problems, and I just got a new laptop so copied my > Firefox profile folder across from the old one and got an error page > from the extension that it could no longer find the C library. > Re-installing the extension resolved this but I was wondering if > there was a reason why you didn't keep the C library in the extension > folder inside the users profile. By storing it elsewhere it means that > anyone who has a roaming profile under Windows will have to reinstall > the extension on each new machine they use. > > > > Paul. > > > This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named > recipient only and may be confidential. If you are not the named > addressee, you are not authorised to retain, read, copy or disseminate > this message or any part of it. If you receive this transmission in > error, please notify us immediately at car...@bs... and > then delete this e-mail. As Internet communications are not secure we > do not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message > nor responsibility for any change made to this message after it was > sent by the original sender. The contents or opinions contained within > this e-mail are solely those of the sender and do not necessarily > represent those of Business Systems Group Holdings plc unless > otherwise specifically stated. We advise you to carry out your own > virus check before opening any attachment as we cannot accept > liability for any damage sustained as a result of any software viruses. |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-07-19 18:48:29
|
Hi Martin, I have corrected this in my current version. It will be in the beta version 0.831 that I hope to release soon, with a bump in the maxversion for allowing to use the extension with Firefox 2. Marc Martin Lindhe wrote: > > Hello! > > > > I have been using HTML Validator for some time now and it's one of my > must-have extensions on a fresh firefox install, brilliant software! > > I have started using Firefox 2.0b1 and would just like to report that > HTML Validator 0.83 beta is working great with it, with just one minor > issue. > > > > Dobule clicking on the HTML Validator icon in the status bar no longer > brings up the "View page source". > > However, if its opened with rightclicking the webpage and selecting > "View page source", HTML Validator works perfectly. > > > > Best regards > > Martin Lindhe > > > |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-07-19 18:46:17
|
Hi Jorge, Are you sure that you use the SGML parser ? It is in the options. Please read this too:=20 http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/user_guide.html#Tidy_vs_SGML_parse= r_ Marc Jorge Blazquez wrote: > Hi Marc, > > i tried the beta but still get the green mark of valid xhtml. I've been= =20 > looking for the bug number but haven't found it. > By the way, the beta looks really nice > > Regards > Jorge > > Marc Gueury escribi=F3: > =20 >> Hi Jorge, >> >> This is a bug in tidy that I never find back the right number, but=20 >> that you can find >> here http://tidy.sf.net/ if you look in the bugs. >> >> To see the error you speak about here, maybe try the 0.8x beta that=20 >> you can >> find here: >> >> http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html >> >> The beta is really stable. It is a beta until that all features are=20 >> frozen. >> >> Marc >> >> Ps: CC to the mailing list. >> >> >> Jorge Blazquez wrote: >> =20 >>> Hi Mark, >>> >>> I've been using the HTML Validator extension for Firefox for quite a=20 >>> lot. I find it a fantastic feature, so thanks fro doing it :-) >>> It's always great to see the green mark at the bottom right of the=20 >>> page ;-) >>> >>> Bu today I was expecting a red mark to appear and I got the green=20 >>> check mark, which surprised me. I had an invalid html page but HTML=20 >>> Tidy was telling me it was all ok. Since I know it's very rare that's= =20 >>> a bug, i guess maybe i have'nt configured it right. >>> >>> Here's the html code i'm testing: >>> >>> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" >>> "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> >>> <html xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang=3D"es" xml:lang=3D"= es"> >>> <head> >>> <title>PRUEBA</title> >>> </head> >>> <body> >>> <dl> >>> <dt>skkdkjd >>> <dd>lllllll >>> </dl> </body> >>> </html> >>> >>> Since I'm using XHTML it should point errors since the dt and dd=20 >>> element's aren't closed. (btw, I'm using version 0.7.9.3) >>> >>> Thanks for your time >>> >>> Jorge >>> >>> >>> =20 > > > -----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share= your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D= DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Htmlvalidator-help mailing list > Htm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlvalidator-help > > > > =20 |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-07-19 18:44:32
|
Hi Stef, HTML allows uppercase tags. Not XHTML. It could be that tidy has a bug about it or that the DTD is not well defined in your case. What means that the XHTML/HTML detection works differently for both program. I need a testcase to log such a bug in Tidy and to see if it is really a bug. Hope it helps, Marc Ps: Please read this: http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html Stef Nychka wrote: > > Hi, Marc. I really like your validator. It provides better > context, which w3c's does not (handy if the source has a > server side include, which screws up line numbers), and it > seems like the errors are much more descriptive (eg. & vs. > &). > > Thanx! > > I noticed one discrepancy, though. Your validator allows > <OL>, and likely all upper case tags, where as w3c's does > not (well, it requires <ol>, at least). > > The following's not important, likely, but just in case: > > - I downloaded yours from > > https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/249/ > (Windows version 0.793) > > I'm running it on Windows 2000, Firefox 1.5.0.4. I > don't believe I have any other Firefox "addons" > installed. > > - The w3c validator I'm using is at > > http://validator.w3.org/ > > - I haven't tested things out thoroughly, but am fairly > certain about the discrepancy. > > Cheers > |
|
From: Jorge B. <JOR...@te...> - 2006-07-19 17:27:49
|
Hi Marc, i tried the beta but still get the green mark of valid xhtml. I've been=20 looking for the bug number but haven't found it. By the way, the beta looks really nice Regards Jorge Marc Gueury escribi=F3: > Hi Jorge, > > This is a bug in tidy that I never find back the right number, but=20 > that you can find > here http://tidy.sf.net/ if you look in the bugs. > > To see the error you speak about here, maybe try the 0.8x beta that=20 > you can > find here: > > http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html > > The beta is really stable. It is a beta until that all features are=20 > frozen. > > Marc > > Ps: CC to the mailing list. > > > Jorge Blazquez wrote: >> Hi Mark, >> >> I've been using the HTML Validator extension for Firefox for quite a=20 >> lot. I find it a fantastic feature, so thanks fro doing it :-) >> It's always great to see the green mark at the bottom right of the=20 >> page ;-) >> >> Bu today I was expecting a red mark to appear and I got the green=20 >> check mark, which surprised me. I had an invalid html page but HTML=20 >> Tidy was telling me it was all ok. Since I know it's very rare that's=20 >> a bug, i guess maybe i have'nt configured it right. >> >> Here's the html code i'm testing: >> >> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" >> "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> >> <html xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang=3D"es" xml:lang=3D"e= s"> >> <head> >> <title>PRUEBA</title> >> </head> >> <body> >> <dl> >> <dt>skkdkjd >> <dd>lllllll >> </dl> </body> >> </html> >> >> Since I'm using XHTML it should point errors since the dt and dd=20 >> element's aren't closed. (btw, I'm using version 0.7.9.3) >> >> Thanks for your time >> >> Jorge >> >> > |
|
From: David M. <dav...@sa...> - 2006-07-19 08:05:06
|
Marc, =20 I do not have alot of extensions installed. =20 I am running firefox version 1.5.0.4. I am running XP sp2 fully patched up. =20 Cheers, =20 David. -----Original Message----- From: Marc Gueury [mailto:mg...@sk...]=20 Sent: 18 July 2006 23:56 To: dav...@sa... Cc: HTML Validator Subject: Re: HTML Validator Error Hi, To get the debug output, you need to have the validator installed correctly. It seems it is not ? Have you a lot of extensions installed ?=20 Which version of Firefox is it ?=20 Which OS and version ? Marc Ps: CC to the mailing list David Murgatroyd wrote:=20 Hi,=20 I have downloaded and installed the Windows 32 bit html validator that correctly installed, however I get the error "FATAL ERROR : The dynamic C library contained in the extension file could not be found. ". <<...>>=20 I have changed the firefox settings to output the debug log files but these are not produced after restarting firefox.=20 Regards,=20 David Murgatroyd=20 Development Manager=20 Sanderson=20 Batley Business Centre=20 Technology Drive=20 Batley=20 WF17 6ER=20 DTel: +44 (0)1924 520303=20 Tel: +44 (0)1924 520300=20 Fax: +44 (0)1924 520301=20 <http://www.sanderson.com> www.sanderson.com=20 IT solutions driving continual business improvement=20 ###########################################################################= ### ######## =20 This email is from Sanderson Group plc or a subsidiary of Sanderson Group p= lc ('the company') and is for the personal use of the intended recipient(s). T= he email and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s) and may not be legally privileged or contain propriety and private information. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not revi= ew, copy or distribute this message. If received in error, please notify the sender and delete the message from your system. =20 Any views or opinions expressed in this email and any files transmitted with it are those of the author only and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company and do not create any legally binding rights or obligations whatsoever. Unless otherwise pre-agreed by exchange of hard copy documents signed by duly authorised representatives, contracts may not be concluded on behalf of the company by email. =20 Please note that neither the company nor the sender accepts any responsibil= ity for any viruses and it is your responsibility to scan the email and any attachments. All email received and sent by the company may be monitored to protect its business interests. =20 ###########################################################################= ### ######## =20 _____ =20 ###########################################################################= ########### This email is from Sanderson Group plc or a subsidiary of Sanderson Group p= lc ('the company') and is for the personal use of the intended recipient(s)= . The email and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the inten= ded recipient(s) and may not be legally privileged or contain propriety and= private information. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not rev= iew, copy or distribute this message. If received in error, please notify t= he sender and delete the message from your system. Any views or opinions expressed in this email and any files transmitted wit= h it are those of the author only and may not necessarily reflect the views= of the company and do not create any legally binding rights or obligations= whatsoever. Unless otherwise pre-agreed by exchange of hard copy documents= signed by duly authorised representatives, contracts may not be concluded = on behalf of the company by email. Please note that neither the company nor the sender accepts any responsibil= ity for any viruses and it is your responsibility to scan the email and any= attachments. All email received and sent by the company may be monitored t= o protect its business interests. ###########################################################################= ########### |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-07-18 23:11:12
|
Hi Gilles, I will try to change it for the beta of the next version. I am not too fan of supporting the beta of Firefox, since it caused me a = lot of issues in the past. But I should try if it works :-) It seems an unexpected good news seen all the problem I got in 1.5. Marc Gilles R=C9ANT wrote: > Hi! > You should change the compatibility range of your firefox plug-in. > It is currently betwenn the versions 0.8 & 1.5.0.* > The version beta testers use currently is the 2.0b1. > I made it myself for my personnal use (works perfectly), but I believe=20 > it's preventing some users from using it currently. > Good luck for your future work on this plug-in. > /*Gilles*/ |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-07-18 23:07:08
|
Hi Jorge, This is a bug in tidy that I never find back the right number, but that you can find here http://tidy.sf.net/ if you look in the bugs. To see the error you speak about here, maybe try the 0.8x beta that you can find here: http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/preview_080.html The beta is really stable. It is a beta until that all features are frozen. Marc Ps: CC to the mailing list. Jorge Blazquez wrote: > Hi Mark, > > I've been using the HTML Validator extension for Firefox for quite a > lot. I find it a fantastic feature, so thanks fro doing it :-) > It's always great to see the green mark at the bottom right of the > page ;-) > > Bu today I was expecting a red mark to appear and I got the green > check mark, which surprised me. I had an invalid html page but HTML > Tidy was telling me it was all ok. Since I know it's very rare that's > a bug, i guess maybe i have'nt configured it right. > > Here's the html code i'm testing: > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="es" xml:lang="es"> > <head> > <title>PRUEBA</title> > </head> > <body> > <dl> > <dt>skkdkjd > <dd>lllllll > </dl> </body> > </html> > > Since I'm using XHTML it should point errors since the dt and dd > element's aren't closed. (btw, I'm using version 0.7.9.3) > > Thanks for your time > > Jorge > > |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-07-18 23:04:12
|
Hi Tomasz, The translation are never changing in a stable release 0.79x. So, the translation of 0.790 works in 0.793. there is no User interface change in a stable realeast. It eases my life. But I distribute the .properties and .dtd files in a lot of languages. But I do not distribute the I do not distribute the *.html files in all versions, else the extension would be too big. If you want I can redistribute the polish version of the DTD and properties files in the 0.794 whenever it comes out. Please send them to me. I am not for translation in version 0.8x yet, since a lot of new strings will be added in the next beta. Please check the http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/roadmap.html and http://users.skynet.be/mgueury/mozilla/translation.html The translation is normally a lot easier with the right utilities, Hope it helps, Marc Ps: CC to the mailing list Tomasz Kuter wrote: > Hi all, > Yesterday i updated Polish translation of the HTML Validator, version > 0.7.9.3 > Currently there there is full translation of GUI and particular > translation of help: > - fully tidy_x.html files > - access: only 1.1.[1-5].x.html > > At any time i try to update Polish translation, there is always new beta > version of extension, > very advanced and translation can't be up to date ever.. :-(( > The same is now: 0.8.3 beta version has come.. > > I noticed following errors/problems: > - if document is XHTML, validation is done and work fine, but you can't > see source page: > + double click on icons in status bar doesn't work > + right click on icons in status -> "Page Source.." doesn't work too > + right click on page -> "Page Source.." works ;-) > > - some help files contain some errors (they don't pass validation by > Tidy/SGML) > + info.html > + no_help.html > + sp_good.html > + sp_start.html > + tidy_1.html > + tidy_27.html > + tidy_46.html > + tidy_51.html > + tidy_53.html > + tidy_85.html > + tidy_good.html > + tidy_start.html > > - my advice: can you change order of "WARNING/ERROR/ACCESS MESSAGES" > in tidy.properties file (eg. order by name)? I don't know why these > messages are in that order, > but currently is very hard to find some string (eg. "tidy_55") in this > file without search function. > > Best regards, > Tom Kuter > > PS. Polish translation of Tidy v. 0.7.9.3 I will send during this week. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Hiszpania za 9 groszy >>> http://link.interia.pl/f197b > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Htmlvalidator-help mailing list > Htm...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlvalidator-help > > > |
|
From: Marc G. <mg...@sk...> - 2006-07-18 22:55:52
|
Hi, To get the debug output, you need to have the validator installed correctly. It seems it is not ? Have you a lot of extensions installed ? Which version of Firefox is it ? Which OS and version ? Marc Ps: CC to the mailing list David Murgatroyd wrote: > > Hi, > > I have downloaded and installed the Windows 32 bit html validator that > correctly installed, however I get the error "FATAL ERROR : The > dynamic C library contained in the extension file could not be found. ". > > <<...>> > I have changed the firefox settings to output the debug log files but > these are not produced after restarting firefox. > > Regards, > > David Murgatroyd > Development Manager > > Sanderson > Batley Business Centre > Technology Drive > Batley > WF17 6ER > > DTel: +44 (0)1924 520303 > Tel: +44 (0)1924 520300 > Fax: +44 (0)1924 520301 > _www.sanderson.com_ <http://www.sanderson.com> > > _IT solutions driving continual business improvement_ > > > > ###################################################################################### > > > > This email is from Sanderson Group plc or a subsidiary of Sanderson > Group plc ('the company') and is for the personal use of the intended > recipient(s). The email and any files transmitted with it are > confidential to the intended recipient(s) and may not be legally > privileged or contain propriety and private information. If you are > not an intended recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this > message. If received in error, please notify the sender and delete the > message from your system. > > > > Any views or opinions expressed in this email and any files > transmitted with it are those of the author only and may not > necessarily reflect the views of the company and do not create any > legally binding rights or obligations whatsoever. Unless otherwise > pre-agreed by exchange of hard copy documents signed by duly > authorised representatives, contracts may not be concluded on behalf > of the company by email. > > > > Please note that neither the company nor the sender accepts any > responsibility for any viruses and it is your responsibility to scan > the email and any attachments. All email received and sent by the > company may be monitored to protect its business interests. > > > > ###################################################################################### > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > |
|
From: Tomasz K. <ev...@in...> - 2006-07-18 14:50:21
|
Hi all, Yesterday i updated Polish translation of the HTML Validator, version 0.7.9.3 Currently there there is full translation of GUI and particular translation of help: - fully tidy_x.html files - access: only 1.1.[1-5].x.html At any time i try to update Polish translation, there is always new beta version of extension, very advanced and translation can't be up to date ever.. :-(( The same is now: 0.8.3 beta version has come.. I noticed following errors/problems: - if document is XHTML, validation is done and work fine, but you can't see source page: + double click on icons in status bar doesn't work + right click on icons in status -> "Page Source.." doesn't work too + right click on page -> "Page Source.." works ;-) - some help files contain some errors (they don't pass validation by Tidy/SGML) + info.html + no_help.html + sp_good.html + sp_start.html + tidy_1.html + tidy_27.html + tidy_46.html + tidy_51.html + tidy_53.html + tidy_85.html + tidy_good.html + tidy_start.html - my advice: can you change order of "WARNING/ERROR/ACCESS MESSAGES" in tidy.properties file (eg. order by name)? I don't know why these messages are in that order, but currently is very hard to find some string (eg. "tidy_55") in this file without search function. Best regards, Tom Kuter PS. Polish translation of Tidy v. 0.7.9.3 I will send during this week. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Hiszpania za 9 groszy >>> http://link.interia.pl/f197b |
|
From: Mediacomm <mar...@me...> - 2006-07-17 10:42:19
|
PGh0bWw+DQo8aGVhZD4NCiAgPG1ldGEgY29udGVudD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PWlzby04 ODU5LTIiIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9ImNvbnRlbnQtdHlwZSI+DQo8L2hlYWQ+DQo8Ym9keSBzdHlsZT0i Y29sb3I6IHJnYigwLCAwLCAwKTsgYmFja2dyb3VuZC1jb2xvcjogcmdiKDExNiwgMTM1LCAxNjUp OyIgYWxpbms9IiMwMDAwOTkiIGxpbms9IiMwMDAwOTkiIHZsaW5rPSIjOTkwMDk5Ij4NCjxjZW50 ZXIgc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiBWZXJkYW5hOyI+DQo8dGFibGUNCiBzdHlsZT0iYmFja2dy b3VuZC1jb2xvcjogcmdiKDI1NSwgMjU1LCAyNTUpOyBtYXJnaW4tbGVmdDogYXV0bzsgbWFyZ2lu LXJpZ2h0OiBhdXRvOyB3aWR0aDogOTAlOyB0ZXh0LWFsaWduOiBsZWZ0OyINCiBib3JkZXI9IjEi IGJvcmRlcmNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMDAwIiBjZWxscGFkZGluZz0iMjAiIGNlbGxzcGFjaW5nPSIyIj4N CiAgPHRib2R5Pg0KICAgIDx0cj4NCiAgICAgIDx0ZCBzdHlsZT0idmVydGljYWwtYWxpZ246IHRv cDsiPg0KICAgICAgPHRhYmxlIHN0eWxlPSJ3aWR0aDogMTAwJTsgdGV4dC1hbGlnbjogbGVmdDsi IGJvcmRlcj0iMCIgY2VsbHBhZGRpbmc9IjAiIGNlbGxzcGFjaW5nPSIwIj4NCiAgICAgICAgPHRi b2R5Pg0KICAgICAgICAgIDx0cj4NCiAgICAgICAgICAgIDxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6 IDEzcHQ7Ij48Yj5NaW5pLU1CQTwvYj48L3NwYW4+Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7Jm5ic3A7PGENCiBocmVm PSJodHRwOi93d3cubWluaW1iYS5odSI+d3d3Lm1pbmltYmEuaHU8L2E+PGJyPjxicj4NCjxzcGFu IHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6IDhwdDsiPg0KMjAwNi4gc3plcHRlbWJlciA0LTkuLCBCdWRhcGVz dDxicj4NCjIwMDYuIG9rdPNiZXIgMjMtMjguLCBEb2JvZ/Nr9Txicj4NCjIwMDYuIGRlY2VtYmVy IDQtOS4sIEJ1ZGFwZXN0PGJyPg0KPGJyPjxpbWcgYWx0PSJNZWRpYWNvbW0iIHNyYz0iY2lkOjIz ODIyMTItMjIwMDY3MTE3MTA0MTQ5NzAzNTA3QG1lZGlhY29tbS5odSINCiBzdHlsZT0iYm9yZGVy OiAxcHggc29saWQgOyB3aWR0aDogNDUwcHg7IGhlaWdodDogNzZweDsiPjxicj48YnI+PGI+PHNw YW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZTogMTFwdDsiPlRpc3p0ZWx0DQpI9mxneWVtL1VyYW0hPC9zcGFu PjwvYj48YnI+PC9iPg0KICAgICAgICAgICAgPC90ZD4NCiAgICAgICAgICA8L3RyPg0KICAgICAg ICA8L3Rib2R5Pg0KICAgICAgPC90YWJsZT4NCiAgICAgIDxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6 IDEwcHQ7Ij48YnI+S/Z66XAtIOlzIGZlbHP1dmV6ZXT1a25layBzevNs8yBNaW5pIE1CQSBwcm9n cmFtamFpbmthdCBzemVyZXRu6W5rIGJlbXV0YXRuaSDWbm5laywg6XMgaGEgYXpvayBmZWxrZWx0 aWsgc3pha21haSDpcmRla2z1ZOlz6XQsIGFra29yIHN67XZlcyBzZWftdHPpZ+l2ZWwgdGlzenRl bHQgbXVua2F04XJzYWluYWsuPGJyPjxicj4NCg0KRSBsZXbpbGJlbiAoZWxrZXL8bGVuZPUsIGhv Z3kga+lyZXRsZW4gcmVrbOFtb3Qga/xsZGr8bmspIHNlbW1pdCBuZW0gbW9uZGhhdHVuayBhIHBy b2dyYW1va3LzbCwgZXrpcnQgZWz1c3r2ciBpcyBhenQga+lyZW0sIGhvZ3kgIGplbGV6emUsIGhh IGVuZ2Vk6Wx5ZXppLCBob2d5IHByb2dyYW1qYWluayBsZe1y4XPhdCBlbGv8bGRq/Gsg1m5uZWsu IDxicj4NCkEgdm9uYXRrb3rzIGpvZ3N6YWLhbHkgbWlhdHQgdWd5YW5pcyB04Wrpa296dGF0825r YXQgY3NhayBha2tvciBr/GxkKGhldClq/GsgZWwsIGhhINZuIGtvbmty6XRhbiBraWZlamV6aSDp cmRla2z1ZOlz6XQsIGV66XJ0IGFycmEga+lyavxrLCBob2d5IOlyZGVrbPVk6XNlIGVzZXTpbiBr /GxkavZuIGVneSBlLW1haWx0IDxpPjxiPiJ04Wrpa296dGF083Qga+lyZWsiPC9iPjwvaT4gdGFy dGFsb21tYWwgYXogPGENCiBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86aW5mb0BtZWRpYWNvbW0uaHUiPmluZm9AbWVk aWFjb21tLmh1PC9hPiBj7W1yZS4gVuFsYXN6dW5rIHZpc3pvbnQgZXZpZGVucyBt82RvbiBt4XIg a2l06XJuZSBheiBpdHQgbmVtIGxl7XJoYXTzYWtyYSwgamVsZXP8bCBhIGv2dmV0a2V69WtyZTog PGJyPjxicj4NCg0KLSBhIE1pbmkgTUJBIHByb2dyYW1vayBiZW11dGF04XNhIOlzIGhhc3pudWsg PGJyPg0KLSBhIE1pbmkgTUJBLelrIHLpc3psZXRlcyB0ZW1hdGlr4WphPGJyPg0KLSBheiBva3Rh dPNrLCB0culuZXJlayBiZW11dGF04XNhPGJyPg0KLSBoZWx5c3rtbmVrPGJyPg0KLSBpZPVwb250 b2s8YnI+DQotIHLpc3p26XRlbGkgZO1qYWsg6XMga2VkdmV6belueWVrPGJyPg0KLSBhIHN6YWtr 6XB66XNpIGFsYXAgdGVyaOlyZSB09nJ06W71IGVsc3rhbW9s4XM8YnI+DQotIGplbGVudGtleulz PGJyPjxicj4NCg0KSGEgYXogZW5nZWTpbHlleulzIGVs9XR0IGVs9XpldGVzZW4gdOFq6WtvevNk bmkga+124W4sIGFra29yIGEgPGENCiBocmVmPSJodHRwOi93d3cubWluaW1iYS5odSI+d3d3Lm1p bmltYmEuaHU8L2E+IHdlYnNpdGUgaXMgc2Vn7XRoZXRpIHThaulrb3rzZOFz4XQuIDxicj48YnI+ DQoNClRpc3p0ZWxldHRlbCD8ZHb2emxpOjxicj48YnI+DQoNCkhlc3ogQXR0aWxhPGJyPjxicj4N Cg0KUC5TLjxicj4NCkhhIG5lbSBzemVyZXRu6SwgaG9neSBhIGr2dvViZW4gbWVna2VyZXNz/Gss IGvpcmr8aywgPGENCiBocmVmPSJodHRwOi8vd3d3Lm1lZGlhY29tbS5odS9sZWlyYXRrb3phcy9p bmRleC5waHA/Yz1zdWJzY3ImZT1odG1sdmFsaWRhdG9yLWhlbHBAbGlzdHMuc291cmNlZm9yZ2Uu bmV0Ij5rYXR0aW50c29uIGlkZSE8L2E+PC9zcGFuPiANCjwvdGQ+DQogICAgPC90cj4NCiAgPC90 Ym9keT4NCjwvdGFibGU+DQo8L2NlbnRlcj4NCjwvYm9keT4NCjwvaHRtbD4NCg== |
2 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
