From: Mike B. <mb...@Ga...> - 2003-04-22 19:29:52
|
Mike Bresnahan wrote: >>Is it safe to assume that 160 is always a non-breakable >>space? I know >>that some encodings don't use 160 (I've been burned by that >>on some unix >>machines) but by the time the string has been converted into unicode >>within java, this may have already been adjusted. > > > That's a very good question, which I don't know the answer to. I'm > pretty clueless when it comes to character sets and > internationalization. I think it is part of what it means to be a > US citizen. :-) I'll leave it as-is for now. Perhaps someone who is using an encoding other than ISO-8859-1 can let us know if non-breaking spaces are working correctly. -- Mike Bowler Principal, Gargoyle Software Inc. Voice: (416) 822-0973 | Email : mb...@Ga... Fax : (416) 822-0975 | Website: http://www.GargoyleSoftware.com |