From: Mike B. <MBr...@go...> - 2003-04-22 19:13:34
|
> Is it safe to assume that 160 is always a non-breakable=20 > space? I know=20 > that some encodings don't use 160 (I've been burned by that=20 > on some unix=20 > machines) but by the time the string has been converted into unicode=20 > within java, this may have already been adjusted. That's a very good question, which I don't know the answer to. I'm pretty clueless when it comes to character sets and internationalization. I think it is part of what it means to be a US citizen. Mike |