Re: [Htmlunit-user] ScriptPreProcessor is removed?

[Rural H. <rur...@gm...>]

Hi Ronald,

We do need a similar solution. We usually supply a overridden pre-processor
to WebClient and do things like this in the pre-processor:
    @Override
    public String preProcess(HtmlPage hp, String sourceCode, String
sourceName, int lineNumber, HtmlElement he)
    {
        //qq zone temp fix
        if(sourceName.indexOf("/qzone/")>0&&sourceCode.indexOf("if(
QZFL.userAgent.ie)")>0)
        {
            //System.out.println("Found ua code at
"+sourceName+"#"+lineNumber);
            return sourceCode.replace("if(QZFL.userAgent.ie)", "if(false)");
        }
        **/

        return sourceCode;
    }

Sometimes it's not a bug and sometimes it's not practicable to wait for a
fix.

2016-08-25 14:07 GMT+08:00 Ronald Brill <rb...@rb...>:

> >We usually use this to diagnose js errors and filter/replace problematic
> js if we can not fix it.
>
> But this was not done by the original ScriptPreProcessor? How have you
> done this.
> Do you need a similar solution?
>
> Regarding problematic js - if HtmlUnit differs from real browsers this is
> a bug. Please report all this situations and we will try (sooner or later
> ;-) to fix this.
>
>         RBRi
>
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:00:14 +0800 Rural Hunter wrote:
> >
> >Hi Ronald,
> >
> >We don't use a customized version. We were using 2.14 and I just try to
> >upgraded to 2.23. We usually use this to diagnose js errors and
> >filter/replace problematic js if we can not fix it.
> >
> >2016-08-24 23:20 GMT+08:00 Ronald Brill <rb...@rb...>:
> >
> >> On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:01:48 +0800 Rural Hunter wrote:
> >> >
> >> >I just tried to upgrade my htmlunit dependency from 2.14 to 2.23 and
> found
> >> >the ScriptPreProcessor is removed. I searched the javadoc and change
> >> >history but didn't find anything about the function deprecation. Why
> is it
> >> >removed and anything else I can use to replace it?
> >> >
> >>
> >> ScriptPreProcessor was removed as part of the removal of IE8 support.
> >> Do you have a customized version in use and if yes what problem do you
> >> solve with this?
> >>
> >>         RBRI
> >>
> >
> >
>
>