htmlunit-user

[Htmlunit-user] HtmlUnit 1.4 released

[Mike B. <mb...@Ga...>]

HtmlUnit 1.4 has been released.  Thanks to everyone who has contributed.

Change log at http://htmlunit.sourceforge.net/changes-report.html

-- 
Mike Bowler
Principal, Gargoyle Software Inc.
Voice: (416) 822-0973 | Email  : mb...@Ga...
Fax  : (416) 822-0975 | Website: http://www.GargoyleSoftware.com

RE: [Htmlunit-user] HtmlUnit 1.4 released

[Mike B. <mbr...@vi...>]

> HtmlUnit 1.4 has been released.  Thanks to everyone who has contributed.

Cool!  Thanks for all the work.

This release took me by surprise.  I didn't see any discussion about when
1.4 would be released.  Why did you not release a 1.4-pre1?

Re: [Htmlunit-user] HtmlUnit 1.4 released

[Mike B. <mb...@Ga...>]

Mike Bresnahan wrote:

>This release took me by surprise.  I didn't see any discussion about when
>1.4 would be released.  Why did you not release a 1.4-pre1?
>  
>

One of the committers proposed a release a couple of days ago and there 
seemed to be general agreement.  I believe that the long pre-release 
cycle for 1.3 was a mistake - it went on for far too long - so this time 
we're doing a much faster release.  If we get feedback that this was too 
fast then we'll adjust again for the next release.

-- 
Mike Bowler
Principal, Gargoyle Software Inc.
Voice: (416) 822-0973 | Email  : mb...@Ga...
Fax  : (416) 822-0975 | Website: http://www.GargoyleSoftware.com

Re: [Htmlunit-user] HtmlUnit 1.4 released

[David D.K. <ddk...@ki...>]

Eric S. Raymond sums it up here:

Release early, release often
http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar/ 
ar01s04.html

Dave


On Jan 11, 2005, at 6:39 AM, Mike Bowler wrote:

> Mike Bresnahan wrote:
>
>> This release took me by surprise.  I didn't see any discussion about  
>> when
>> 1.4 would be released.  Why did you not release a 1.4-pre1?
>
> One of the committers proposed a release a couple of days ago and  
> there seemed to be general agreement.  I believe that the long  
> pre-release cycle for 1.3 was a mistake - it went on for far too long  
> - so this time we're doing a much faster release.  If we get feedback  
> that this was too fast then we'll adjust again for the next release.