htmlunit-user — Discussion of the use of HtmlUnit

Re: [Htmlunit-user] Need to use a browser after an htmlUnit test

[Gael H. <gae...@ho...>]

it works, thank you Marc.

>From: Marc Guillemot <mgu...@ya...>
>Reply-To: htm...@li...
>To: htm...@li...
>Subject: Re: [Htmlunit-user] Need to use a browser after an htmlUnit test
>Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 12:18:45 +0200
>
>ok. The problem has been fixed since version 1.5 but not yet released. If 
>you get the sources directly from CVS you will benefit of the last changes.
>
>Marc.
>
>Gael Harbonnier wrote:
>>A simple  example: I start with www.google.com, I fill the form for a 
>>htmlunit search, and so I want to get this url:  
>>http://www.google.fr/search?hl=fr&q=htmlunit&btnG=Recherche+Google&meta=
>>
>>here's the source code:
>>
>>WebClient webClient = new WebClient();
>>
>>HtmlPage pageCourrante = (HtmlPage)webClient.getPage( new 
>>URL("http://www.google.com") );
>>
>>webClient.setRedirectEnabled(false);
>>webClient.setJavaScriptEnabled(false);
>>
>>HtmlForm form = (HtmlForm)pageCourrante.getAllForms().get(0);
>>HtmlTextInput search= (HtmlTextInput)form.getInputByName("q");
>>search.setValueAttribute("htmlunit");
>>HtmlSubmitInput submit = (HtmlSubmitInput)form.getInputByValue("Recherche 
>>Google");
>>HtmlPage page = (HtmlPage)submit.click();
>>System.out.println(page.getWebResponse().getUrl());
>>
>>If you run that, it will print http://www.google.fr/search
>>
>>
>>>From: Marc Guillemot <mgu...@ya...>
>>>Reply-To: htm...@li...
>>>To: htm...@li...
>>>Subject: Re: [Htmlunit-user] Need to use a browser after an htmlUnit test
>>>Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 10:59:17 +0200
>>>
>>>can you provide an example with the url you get and the one you expected?
>>>
>>>Marc.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
>>Want to be the first software developer in space?
>>Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
>>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
>>_______________________________________________
>>Htmlunit-user mailing list
>>Htm...@li...
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user
>>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
>Want to be the first software developer in space?
>Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
>_______________________________________________
>Htmlunit-user mailing list
>Htm...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user

Re: [Htmlunit-user] Need to use a browser after an htmlUnit test

[Marc G. <mgu...@ya...>]

ok. The problem has been fixed since version 1.5 but not yet released. If you get the sources directly from CVS you will 
benefit of the last changes.

Marc.

Gael Harbonnier wrote:
> A simple  example: I start with www.google.com, I fill the form for a 
> htmlunit search, and so I want to get this url:  
> http://www.google.fr/search?hl=fr&q=htmlunit&btnG=Recherche+Google&meta=
> 
> here's the source code:
> 
> WebClient webClient = new WebClient();
> 
> HtmlPage pageCourrante = (HtmlPage)webClient.getPage( new 
> URL("http://www.google.com") );
> 
> webClient.setRedirectEnabled(false);
> webClient.setJavaScriptEnabled(false);
> 
> HtmlForm form = (HtmlForm)pageCourrante.getAllForms().get(0);
> HtmlTextInput search= (HtmlTextInput)form.getInputByName("q");
> search.setValueAttribute("htmlunit");
> HtmlSubmitInput submit = 
> (HtmlSubmitInput)form.getInputByValue("Recherche Google");
> HtmlPage page = (HtmlPage)submit.click();
> System.out.println(page.getWebResponse().getUrl());
> 
> If you run that, it will print http://www.google.fr/search
> 
> 
>> From: Marc Guillemot <mgu...@ya...>
>> Reply-To: htm...@li...
>> To: htm...@li...
>> Subject: Re: [Htmlunit-user] Need to use a browser after an htmlUnit test
>> Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 10:59:17 +0200
>>
>> can you provide an example with the url you get and the one you expected?
>>
>> Marc.
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
> Want to be the first software developer in space?
> Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Htmlunit-user mailing list
> Htm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user
> 

Re: [Htmlunit-user] Need to use a browser after an htmlUnit test

[Gael H. <gae...@ho...>]

A simple  example: I start with www.google.com, I fill the form for a 
htmlunit search, and so I want to get this url:  
http://www.google.fr/search?hl=fr&q=htmlunit&btnG=Recherche+Google&meta=

here's the source code:

WebClient webClient = new WebClient();

HtmlPage pageCourrante = (HtmlPage)webClient.getPage( new 
URL("http://www.google.com") );

webClient.setRedirectEnabled(false);
webClient.setJavaScriptEnabled(false);

HtmlForm form = (HtmlForm)pageCourrante.getAllForms().get(0);
HtmlTextInput search= (HtmlTextInput)form.getInputByName("q");
search.setValueAttribute("htmlunit");
HtmlSubmitInput submit = (HtmlSubmitInput)form.getInputByValue("Recherche 
Google");
HtmlPage page = (HtmlPage)submit.click();
System.out.println(page.getWebResponse().getUrl());

If you run that, it will print http://www.google.fr/search


>From: Marc Guillemot <mgu...@ya...>
>Reply-To: htm...@li...
>To: htm...@li...
>Subject: Re: [Htmlunit-user] Need to use a browser after an htmlUnit test
>Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 10:59:17 +0200
>
>can you provide an example with the url you get and the one you expected?
>
>Marc.
>

Re: [Htmlunit-user] Need to use a browser after an htmlUnit test

[Marc G. <mgu...@ya...>]

can you provide an example with the url you get and the one you expected?

Marc.

Gael Harbonnier wrote:
> I tried this before with this code but with all the tested websites 
> (Gmail, Google, Voila) it displays the source page not the result page.
> 
> Gael
> 
>> From: Marc Guillemot <mgu...@ya...>
>> Reply-To: htm...@li...
>> To: htm...@li...
>> Subject: Re: [Htmlunit-user] Need to use a browser after an htmlUnit test
>> Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 10:28:11 +0200
>>
>> isn't it just:
>>
>> HtmlPage page = (HtmlPage)submit.click();
>>
>> //Now I want to give the url of the resulting page to a component (a 
>> JDic webBrowser) to display it.
>> //The code backward allows me to login so I may see my mail box.
>> WebBrowser displayer = new WebBrowser();
>> displayer.setURL( page.getWebResponse().getUrl() );
>>
>>
>> Marc.
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
>> Want to be the first software developer in space?
>> Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
>> _______________________________________________
>> Htmlunit-user mailing list
>> Htm...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
> Want to be the first software developer in space?
> Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Htmlunit-user mailing list
> Htm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user
> 

Re: [Htmlunit-user] Need to use a browser after an htmlUnit test

[Gael H. <gae...@ho...>]

I tried this before with this code but with all the tested websites (Gmail, 
Google, Voila) it displays the source page not the result page.

Gael

>From: Marc Guillemot <mgu...@ya...>
>Reply-To: htm...@li...
>To: htm...@li...
>Subject: Re: [Htmlunit-user] Need to use a browser after an htmlUnit test
>Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 10:28:11 +0200
>
>isn't it just:
>
>HtmlPage page = (HtmlPage)submit.click();
>
>//Now I want to give the url of the resulting page to a component (a JDic 
>webBrowser) to display it.
>//The code backward allows me to login so I may see my mail box.
>WebBrowser displayer = new WebBrowser();
>displayer.setURL( page.getWebResponse().getUrl() );
>
>
>Marc.
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
>Want to be the first software developer in space?
>Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7393&alloc_id=16281&op=click
>_______________________________________________
>Htmlunit-user mailing list
>Htm...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user

Re: [Htmlunit-user] Need to use a browser after an htmlUnit test

[Marc G. <mgu...@ya...>]

isn't it just:

HtmlPage page = (HtmlPage)submit.click();

//Now I want to give the url of the resulting page to a component (a JDic webBrowser) to display it.
//The code backward allows me to login so I may see my mail box.
WebBrowser displayer = new WebBrowser();
displayer.setURL( page.getWebResponse().getUrl() );


Marc.

Re: [Htmlunit-user] Need to use a browser after an htmlUnit test

[Gael H. <gae...@ho...>]

thanks for your reply,


>What do you mean that you can't "recover the mailBox url" in Gmail?  Are
>you talking about the initial URL that "loads" the inbox, like this:
>
>   
>http://gmail.google.com/gmail?&ik=&search=inbox&view=tl&start=0&init=1&zx=xsrkd6-mkd75r
>
>In order to "catch" that, you'll probably have to turn off either
>JavaScript or redirects (or both).  Assuming you have an HtmlPage
>object (NOTE: method names are from memory; they may be slightly
>different):
>
>   WebClient webClient = htmlPage.getWebClient();
>   webClient.setRedirectEnabled(false);
>   webClient.setJavaScriptEnabled(false);
>
>You'll have to do this AFTER you load the initial page, but BEFORE you
>submit the "Sign In" button in the Gmail example.
>

I need to find the URL of the page after I filled the form and after I 
clicked on a submit button because I want to display the resulting web page 
on firefox or on a swing component for example. But this should be useful 
thx.

>Are you assigning the output from the submit() method after you submit
>the form?  That will be the resulting html page.
>

yes a sample code:

WebClient webClient = new WebClient();

HtmlPage pageCourrante = (HtmlPage)webClient.getPage( new 
URL("http://www.gmail.com") );

webClient.setRedirectEnabled(false);
webClient.setJavaScriptEnabled(false);

HtmlForm form = (HtmlForm)pageCourrante.getAllForms().get(0);
HtmlTextInput mail = 
(HtmlTextInput)form.getInputByName("Email");	mail.setValueAttribute("my...@gm...");
HtmlPasswordInput pass = (HtmlPasswordInput)form.getInputByName("Passwd");
pass.setValueAttribute("*******");
HtmlSubmitInput submit = (HtmlSubmitInput)form.getInputByName("null");
HtmlPage page = (HtmlPage)submit.click();

//Now I want to give the url of the resulting page to a component (a JDic 
webBrowser) to display it.
//The code backward allows me to login so I may see my mail box.
WebBrowser displayer = new WebBrowser();
displayer.setURL( ... );

But I don't succeed in finding the page URL with getFullyQualifiedUrl 
method.
There's also a 302 error if you try this example, but I don't care, gmail is 
just an example to help me to understand.

Gael

Re: [Htmlunit-user] Need to use a browser after an htmlUnit test

[<ddk...@ki...>]

What do you mean that you can't "recover the mailBox url" in Gmail?  Are
you talking about the initial URL that "loads" the inbox, like this:

  http://gmail.google.com/gmail?&ik=&search=inbox&view=tl&start=0&init=1&zx=xsrkd6-mkd75r

In order to "catch" that, you'll probably have to turn off either
JavaScript or redirects (or both).  Assuming you have an HtmlPage
object (NOTE: method names are from memory; they may be slightly
different):

  WebClient webClient = htmlPage.getWebClient();
  webClient.setRedirectEnabled(false);
  webClient.setJavaScriptEnabled(false);

You'll have to do this AFTER you load the initial page, but BEFORE you
submit the "Sign In" button in the Gmail example.

Are you assigning the output from the submit() method after you submit
the form?  That will be the resulting html page.

Dave


On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 06:18:14PM +0200, Gael Harbonnier wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I work on an application that automates the forms' filling and display the 
> result page on a swing component. It's possible thanks to HtmlUnit but I 
> need to recover the resulting web page to continue to navigate. the method 
> asXml can't give me an online way to display the page and 
> getFullyQualifiedUrl is useless with some websites (like gmail: try to 
> automate the login form, you can't recover the mailBox url). Could you help 
> me ?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gael

[Htmlunit-user] Need to use a browser after an htmlUnit test

[Gael H. <gae...@ho...>]

Hi,

I work on an application that automates the forms' filling and display the 
result page on a swing component. It's possible thanks to HtmlUnit but I 
need to recover the resulting web page to continue to navigate. the method 
asXml can't give me an online way to display the page and 
getFullyQualifiedUrl is useless with some websites (like gmail: try to 
automate the login form, you can't recover the mailBox url). Could you help 
me ?

Thanks,

Gael

RE: [Htmlunit-user] Virtual Host feature -- tests?

[Dan L. <dl...@ca...>]

thank you for the feedback brad.  as i started to look at the getPage
overloading, i see exactly what you mean.

Whatever everyone thinks is the best implementation will work for me.

I opened RFE 1195509 to continue this discussion.

dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: htm...@li...
> [mailto:htm...@li...]On Behalf Of Brad
> Clarke
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 1:14 PM
> To: htm...@li...
> Subject: RE: [Htmlunit-user] Virtual Host feature -- tests?
>
>
> I'm asking lots of questions because I don't like overloading
> getPage...I just
> finished cleaning up that mess! :)
>
> It seems like adding a setVirtualHost on HttpWebConnection would
> be able to
> accomplish what you need and minimize the testing needs. Due to
> the client pooling
> in there you'd need to store the value in HttpWebConnection but I
> think that could
> disappear when the pooling does.
>
> At one point it was suggested that the goal was to expose the
> HttpClient to the user
> for doing things like this. Maybe it would be better to figure
> out how to go about
> that instead?
>
> Brad C
>
> --- Dan Levine <dl...@ca...> wrote:
>
> > Brad,
> >
> > I want to run test cases for hostnames that are not registered
> in DNS, and
> > don't want to hack the hostnames into /etc/hosts on every
> machine that the
> > tests will run on.  So I want to embed the /etc/host virtual
> host mapping
> > into the HttpClient.  That functionality is available through
> >
> > 	commonsHttpClient.getParams().setVirtualHost("www.mydomain.com");
> >
> >
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/3.0/apidocs/org/apach
> e/commons/
> > httpclient/params/HostParams.html#setVirtualHost(java.lang.String)
> >
> > Then you can htmlUnitWebClient.getPage with a URL "192.168.10.10" and if
> > there are cookies on that site that reqire the domain to be
> "mydomain.com"
> > it will work.  That is useful for testing locally sites that
> have required
> > cookies for the eventual DNS of the production site.
> >
> > I have very simple test cases with HtmlUnit that show this to
> work, but I am
> > trying to break it down to JUnit tests with mock objects so I
> can submit a
> > patch to HtmlUnit.
> >
> >
> > Chris,
> >
> > > I would start by overloading the getPage call to add the extra
> > > parameter.  This would then allow all of the existing calls still work
> > > and you would only be adding the test that calls your new method.
> >
> > Yes, I am doing it like that :), but I dont know how to write
> Junit tests
> > for a getPage(..) call using the GS mock objects, and I dont
> see any other
> > examples I can model off.  I cant use the MockWebConnection obviously
> > because I have to use the HttpWebConnection, so ... ? Is there
> an example of
> > how to mock this?
> >
> > -d
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: htm...@li...
> > > [mailto:htm...@li...]On Behalf Of Brad
> > > Clarke
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 1:22 PM
> > > To: htm...@li...
> > > Subject: Re: [Htmlunit-user] Virtual Host feature -- tests?
> > >
> > >
> > > I've only heard the term virtual host used when talking about
> > > apache virtual hosts,
> > > which doesn't seem right. Could you point me at some
> > > documentation about what it is
> > > you are doing?
> > >
> > > Brad C
> > >
> > > --- Dan Levine <dl...@ca...> wrote:
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > I need to allow virtual host functionality for my tests.  After
> > > asking here
> > > > a bit ago, I took the issue up with the HttpClient list.  They
> > > showed my how
> > > > to achieve this functionality which I began testing out thought the
> > > > HttpClient in the HttpWebConnection class.  turns out there
> was a bug in
> > > > HttpClient, and they have now provided a patch.  Now, I would
> > > like to add an
> > > > additional parameter to WebClient.getPage(..) to take a String
> > > virtualHost
> > > > in as well as a URL.  I am not sure how to go about writing
> > > tests for this
> > > > however, since none of the getPage(..) functions currently have
> > > tests, and
> > > > since this is hitting right in the middle of MockWebConnection.
> > >  Since the
> > > > change also needs to go down into
> HttpWebConnection.getResponse(..) so I
> > > > could add the tests there, but there are not currently any
> tests for the
> > > > HttpWebConnection.getResponse(..) functions that i can
> model it after.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > dan
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: htm...@li...
> > > > > [mailto:htm...@li...]On
> Behalf Of Marc
> > > > > Guillemot
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 6:24 AM
> > > > > To: htm...@li...
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Htmlunit-user] Re: Javascript problem
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Dave Kosenko wrote:
> > > > > > But I am running v 1.5 and am seeing the problem .  Do you
> > > mean that it
> > > > > > is fixed in versions
> > > > > > *after* 1.5?
> > > > >
> > > > > yes, this is has been fixed since version 1.5 and as long as no
> > > > > new release is published, you can only get it using the
> > > > > CVS access.
> > > > >
> > > > > Marc.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
> Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
> opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
> win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
> _______________________________________________
> Htmlunit-user mailing list
> Htm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user
>

RE: [Htmlunit-user] Virtual Host feature -- tests?

[Brad C. <yo...@br...>]

I'm asking lots of questions because I don't like overloading getPage...I just
finished cleaning up that mess! :)

It seems like adding a setVirtualHost on HttpWebConnection would be able to
accomplish what you need and minimize the testing needs. Due to the client pooling
in there you'd need to store the value in HttpWebConnection but I think that could
disappear when the pooling does.

At one point it was suggested that the goal was to expose the HttpClient to the user
for doing things like this. Maybe it would be better to figure out how to go about
that instead?

Brad C

--- Dan Levine <dl...@ca...> wrote:

> Brad,
> 
> I want to run test cases for hostnames that are not registered in DNS, and
> don't want to hack the hostnames into /etc/hosts on every machine that the
> tests will run on.  So I want to embed the /etc/host virtual host mapping
> into the HttpClient.  That functionality is available through
> 
> 	commonsHttpClient.getParams().setVirtualHost("www.mydomain.com");
> 
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/3.0/apidocs/org/apache/commons/
> httpclient/params/HostParams.html#setVirtualHost(java.lang.String)
> 
> Then you can htmlUnitWebClient.getPage with a URL "192.168.10.10" and if
> there are cookies on that site that reqire the domain to be "mydomain.com"
> it will work.  That is useful for testing locally sites that have required
> cookies for the eventual DNS of the production site.
> 
> I have very simple test cases with HtmlUnit that show this to work, but I am
> trying to break it down to JUnit tests with mock objects so I can submit a
> patch to HtmlUnit.
> 
> 
> Chris,
> 
> > I would start by overloading the getPage call to add the extra
> > parameter.  This would then allow all of the existing calls still work
> > and you would only be adding the test that calls your new method.
> 
> Yes, I am doing it like that :), but I dont know how to write Junit tests
> for a getPage(..) call using the GS mock objects, and I dont see any other
> examples I can model off.  I cant use the MockWebConnection obviously
> because I have to use the HttpWebConnection, so ... ? Is there an example of
> how to mock this?
> 
> -d
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: htm...@li...
> > [mailto:htm...@li...]On Behalf Of Brad
> > Clarke
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 1:22 PM
> > To: htm...@li...
> > Subject: Re: [Htmlunit-user] Virtual Host feature -- tests?
> >
> >
> > I've only heard the term virtual host used when talking about
> > apache virtual hosts,
> > which doesn't seem right. Could you point me at some
> > documentation about what it is
> > you are doing?
> >
> > Brad C
> >
> > --- Dan Levine <dl...@ca...> wrote:
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > I need to allow virtual host functionality for my tests.  After
> > asking here
> > > a bit ago, I took the issue up with the HttpClient list.  They
> > showed my how
> > > to achieve this functionality which I began testing out thought the
> > > HttpClient in the HttpWebConnection class.  turns out there was a bug in
> > > HttpClient, and they have now provided a patch.  Now, I would
> > like to add an
> > > additional parameter to WebClient.getPage(..) to take a String
> > virtualHost
> > > in as well as a URL.  I am not sure how to go about writing
> > tests for this
> > > however, since none of the getPage(..) functions currently have
> > tests, and
> > > since this is hitting right in the middle of MockWebConnection.
> >  Since the
> > > change also needs to go down into HttpWebConnection.getResponse(..) so I
> > > could add the tests there, but there are not currently any tests for the
> > > HttpWebConnection.getResponse(..) functions that i can model it after.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > dan
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: htm...@li...
> > > > [mailto:htm...@li...]On Behalf Of Marc
> > > > Guillemot
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 6:24 AM
> > > > To: htm...@li...
> > > > Subject: Re: [Htmlunit-user] Re: Javascript problem
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Dave Kosenko wrote:
> > > > > But I am running v 1.5 and am seeing the problem .  Do you
> > mean that it
> > > > > is fixed in versions
> > > > > *after* 1.5?
> > > >
> > > > yes, this is has been fixed since version 1.5 and as long as no
> > > > new release is published, you can only get it using the
> > > > CVS access.
> > > >
> > > > Marc.

Re: [Htmlunit-user] Javascript Image datatype

[Brad C. <yo...@br...>]

--- Dave Kosenko <dko...@ve...> wrote:
> At 01:57 PM 5/4/2005, you wrote:
> >HtmlUnit doesn't load images at all. Is there something else that's broken?
> 
> So that applies, by design, to both html and javascript?  

I wouldn't say "by design" but that is the way it currently functions for all
images, javascript or no. 

> Does the image even get downloaded, or is it completely ignored?

Completely ignored. Only the URL of the image is kept in the DOM.
 
> [snip]
> 
> If you are using HTMLUnit to do performance testing as well as 
> functionality testing, then
> handling images is important, both the download and render phase, since 
> they contribute
> significantly to the overall "load" time of a web page.  Or do you not see 
> HTMLUnit being
> used for performance testing at all?

HtmlUnit is not currently suited to be a performace testing tool. Images and CSS are
never loaded, client DOM and JavaScript processing is not optimized, and
multithreading is still getting the kinks worked out. While I could see it being
used for performance testing I don't think it will be in the near future.

Brad C

Re: [Htmlunit-user] Javascript Image datatype

[Dave K. <dko...@ve...>]

At 01:57 PM 5/4/2005, you wrote:
>HtmlUnit doesn't load images at all. Is there something else that's broken?
>
>Brad C

So that applies, by design, to both html and javascript?  Does the image 
even get
downloaded, or is it completely ignored?

I've got javascript that's doing something along the likes of the following

function xyz() {
         var x = new Image();
         x.src = 
"http://perfserver:2000/sendmsg.cgi?param1=value1&param2=value2;
}

This function is then called in the onload() and onunload() functions to 
communicate
back to a server (other than the web server) data regarding the performance 
of rendering
the page.  This is a handy bit of functionality, since the setting of the 
src property causes
the page to be fetched to the browser cache which, in this case, is sending 
encoded data
to a server asynchronously.  Since the Image variable is never displayed, 
you don't have
to worry about hiding it in the page somewhere, and you don't really care 
what comes back
from the URL (since it is intended to transmit data).

If you are using HTMLUnit to do performance testing as well as 
functionality testing, then
handling images is important, both the download and render phase, since 
they contribute
significantly to the overall "load" time of a web page.  Or do you not see 
HTMLUnit being
used for performance testing at all?

Dave

Re: [Htmlunit-user] Javascript Image datatype

[Brad C. <yo...@br...>]

HtmlUnit doesn't load images at all. Is there something else that's broken?

Brad C

--- Dave Kosenko <dko...@ve...> wrote:
> 
> Any thoughts on when the Image datatype in javascript will be fully implemented
> in HTMLUnit?
> 
> For javascript executed in any major web browser you can declare a variable 
> of type
> Image and then assign a value to the src property.  If that value is an URL, it
> will be downloaded and cached in the browser, but not, at that point, 
> displayed.  It
> can be displayed later if desired, via document.write() for example.
> 
> I am working with some javascript code that uses this Image functionality to
> communicate performance data (time to render first byte, time to render 
> entire page,
> for example) to a server by encoding it in the URL assigned to the src 
> property.
> Sadly, without the Image datatype being fully implemented, this 
> functionality does
> not work in HTMLUnit.
> 
> Thanks,
> Dave
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
> Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
> opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
> win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
> _______________________________________________
> Htmlunit-user mailing list
> Htm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user
> 

[Htmlunit-user] Javascript Image datatype

[Dave K. <dko...@ve...>]

Any thoughts on when the Image datatype in javascript will be fully implemented
in HTMLUnit?

For javascript executed in any major web browser you can declare a variable 
of type
Image and then assign a value to the src property.  If that value is an URL, it
will be downloaded and cached in the browser, but not, at that point, 
displayed.  It
can be displayed later if desired, via document.write() for example.

I am working with some javascript code that uses this Image functionality to
communicate performance data (time to render first byte, time to render 
entire page,
for example) to a server by encoding it in the URL assigned to the src 
property.
Sadly, without the Image datatype being fully implemented, this 
functionality does
not work in HTMLUnit.

Thanks,
Dave

Re: [Htmlunit-user] Virtual Host feature -- tests?

[Marc G. <mgu...@ya...>]

I think that we can only have good tests for such a feature if we embed a web server in our tests. It is not yet the 
case but it's a big TODO for our tests. I've had a look on how to embed jetty and start tests against it for a while but 
didn't find time to go further.

Marc.

Dan Levine wrote:
> Brad,
> 
> I want to run test cases for hostnames that are not registered in DNS, and
> don't want to hack the hostnames into /etc/hosts on every machine that the
> tests will run on.  So I want to embed the /etc/host virtual host mapping
> into the HttpClient.  That functionality is available through
> 
> 	commonsHttpClient.getParams().setVirtualHost("www.mydomain.com");
> 
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/3.0/apidocs/org/apache/commons/
> httpclient/params/HostParams.html#setVirtualHost(java.lang.String)
> 
> Then you can htmlUnitWebClient.getPage with a URL "192.168.10.10" and if
> there are cookies on that site that reqire the domain to be "mydomain.com"
> it will work.  That is useful for testing locally sites that have required
> cookies for the eventual DNS of the production site.
> 
> I have very simple test cases with HtmlUnit that show this to work, but I am
> trying to break it down to JUnit tests with mock objects so I can submit a
> patch to HtmlUnit.
> 
> 
> Chris,
> 
> 
>>I would start by overloading the getPage call to add the extra
>>parameter.  This would then allow all of the existing calls still work
>>and you would only be adding the test that calls your new method.
> 
> 
> Yes, I am doing it like that :), but I dont know how to write Junit tests
> for a getPage(..) call using the GS mock objects, and I dont see any other
> examples I can model off.  I cant use the MockWebConnection obviously
> because I have to use the HttpWebConnection, so ... ? Is there an example of
> how to mock this?
> 
> -d
> 
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: htm...@li...
>>[mailto:htm...@li...]On Behalf Of Brad
>>Clarke
>>Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 1:22 PM
>>To: htm...@li...
>>Subject: Re: [Htmlunit-user] Virtual Host feature -- tests?
>>
>>
>>I've only heard the term virtual host used when talking about
>>apache virtual hosts,
>>which doesn't seem right. Could you point me at some
>>documentation about what it is
>>you are doing?
>>
>>Brad C
>>
>>--- Dan Levine <dl...@ca...> wrote:
>>
>>>Hey all,
>>>
>>>I need to allow virtual host functionality for my tests.  After
>>
>>asking here
>>
>>>a bit ago, I took the issue up with the HttpClient list.  They
>>
>>showed my how
>>
>>>to achieve this functionality which I began testing out thought the
>>>HttpClient in the HttpWebConnection class.  turns out there was a bug in
>>>HttpClient, and they have now provided a patch.  Now, I would
>>
>>like to add an
>>
>>>additional parameter to WebClient.getPage(..) to take a String
>>
>>virtualHost
>>
>>>in as well as a URL.  I am not sure how to go about writing
>>
>>tests for this
>>
>>>however, since none of the getPage(..) functions currently have
>>
>>tests, and
>>
>>>since this is hitting right in the middle of MockWebConnection.
>>
>> Since the
>>
>>>change also needs to go down into HttpWebConnection.getResponse(..) so I
>>>could add the tests there, but there are not currently any tests for the
>>>HttpWebConnection.getResponse(..) functions that i can model it after.
>>>
>>>Thoughts?
>>>
>>>dan
>>>
>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: htm...@li...
>>>>[mailto:htm...@li...]On Behalf Of Marc
>>>>Guillemot
>>>>Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 6:24 AM
>>>>To: htm...@li...
>>>>Subject: Re: [Htmlunit-user] Re: Javascript problem
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Dave Kosenko wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>But I am running v 1.5 and am seeing the problem .  Do you
>>
>>mean that it
>>
>>>>>is fixed in versions
>>>>>*after* 1.5?
>>>>
>>>>yes, this is has been fixed since version 1.5 and as long as no
>>>>new release is published, you can only get it using the
>>>>CVS access.
>>>>
>>>>Marc.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>>>This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
>>>>Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4
>>
>>great events, 4
>>
>>>>opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
>>>>win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Htmlunit-user mailing list
>>>>Htm...@li...
>>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>>This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
>>>Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4
>>
>>great events, 4
>>
>>>opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
>>>win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Htmlunit-user mailing list
>>>Htm...@li...
>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user
>>>
>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
>>Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
>>opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
>>win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
>>_______________________________________________
>>Htmlunit-user mailing list
>>Htm...@li...
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
> Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
> opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
> win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
> _______________________________________________
> Htmlunit-user mailing list
> Htm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user
> 

[Htmlunit-user] Using htmlunit with JMeter..

[Dantes, E. <Ed....@gd...>]

Hi,
   has anyone paired htmlunit with JMeter to take advantage of JMeters
graphing results, and various splines for analysis?
For anyone that has used JMeter, there has to be a way, that you can
configure the Proxy server, to record you htmlunit tests...I have tried
but with no luck...I am assuming it has something to do with the proxy
configuration and the ports..


Thanks Again!

Ed

RE: [Htmlunit-user] Virtual Host feature -- tests?

[Dan L. <dl...@ca...>]

Brad,

I want to run test cases for hostnames that are not registered in DNS, and
don't want to hack the hostnames into /etc/hosts on every machine that the
tests will run on.  So I want to embed the /etc/host virtual host mapping
into the HttpClient.  That functionality is available through

	commonsHttpClient.getParams().setVirtualHost("www.mydomain.com");

http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/3.0/apidocs/org/apache/commons/
httpclient/params/HostParams.html#setVirtualHost(java.lang.String)

Then you can htmlUnitWebClient.getPage with a URL "192.168.10.10" and if
there are cookies on that site that reqire the domain to be "mydomain.com"
it will work.  That is useful for testing locally sites that have required
cookies for the eventual DNS of the production site.

I have very simple test cases with HtmlUnit that show this to work, but I am
trying to break it down to JUnit tests with mock objects so I can submit a
patch to HtmlUnit.


Chris,

> I would start by overloading the getPage call to add the extra
> parameter.  This would then allow all of the existing calls still work
> and you would only be adding the test that calls your new method.

Yes, I am doing it like that :), but I dont know how to write Junit tests
for a getPage(..) call using the GS mock objects, and I dont see any other
examples I can model off.  I cant use the MockWebConnection obviously
because I have to use the HttpWebConnection, so ... ? Is there an example of
how to mock this?

-d


> -----Original Message-----
> From: htm...@li...
> [mailto:htm...@li...]On Behalf Of Brad
> Clarke
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 1:22 PM
> To: htm...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Htmlunit-user] Virtual Host feature -- tests?
>
>
> I've only heard the term virtual host used when talking about
> apache virtual hosts,
> which doesn't seem right. Could you point me at some
> documentation about what it is
> you are doing?
>
> Brad C
>
> --- Dan Levine <dl...@ca...> wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I need to allow virtual host functionality for my tests.  After
> asking here
> > a bit ago, I took the issue up with the HttpClient list.  They
> showed my how
> > to achieve this functionality which I began testing out thought the
> > HttpClient in the HttpWebConnection class.  turns out there was a bug in
> > HttpClient, and they have now provided a patch.  Now, I would
> like to add an
> > additional parameter to WebClient.getPage(..) to take a String
> virtualHost
> > in as well as a URL.  I am not sure how to go about writing
> tests for this
> > however, since none of the getPage(..) functions currently have
> tests, and
> > since this is hitting right in the middle of MockWebConnection.
>  Since the
> > change also needs to go down into HttpWebConnection.getResponse(..) so I
> > could add the tests there, but there are not currently any tests for the
> > HttpWebConnection.getResponse(..) functions that i can model it after.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > dan
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: htm...@li...
> > > [mailto:htm...@li...]On Behalf Of Marc
> > > Guillemot
> > > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 6:24 AM
> > > To: htm...@li...
> > > Subject: Re: [Htmlunit-user] Re: Javascript problem
> > >
> > >
> > > Dave Kosenko wrote:
> > > > But I am running v 1.5 and am seeing the problem .  Do you
> mean that it
> > > > is fixed in versions
> > > > *after* 1.5?
> > >
> > > yes, this is has been fixed since version 1.5 and as long as no
> > > new release is published, you can only get it using the
> > > CVS access.
> > >
> > > Marc.
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
> > > Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4
> great events, 4
> > > opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
> > > win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Htmlunit-user mailing list
> > > Htm...@li...
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
> > Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4
> great events, 4
> > opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
> > win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
> > _______________________________________________
> > Htmlunit-user mailing list
> > Htm...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user
> >
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
> Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
> opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
> win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
> _______________________________________________
> Htmlunit-user mailing list
> Htm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user
>

Re: [Htmlunit-user] Virtual Host feature -- tests?

[Brad C. <yo...@br...>]

I've only heard the term virtual host used when talking about apache virtual hosts,
which doesn't seem right. Could you point me at some documentation about what it is
you are doing?

Brad C

--- Dan Levine <dl...@ca...> wrote:
> Hey all,
> 
> I need to allow virtual host functionality for my tests.  After asking here
> a bit ago, I took the issue up with the HttpClient list.  They showed my how
> to achieve this functionality which I began testing out thought the
> HttpClient in the HttpWebConnection class.  turns out there was a bug in
> HttpClient, and they have now provided a patch.  Now, I would like to add an
> additional parameter to WebClient.getPage(..) to take a String virtualHost
> in as well as a URL.  I am not sure how to go about writing tests for this
> however, since none of the getPage(..) functions currently have tests, and
> since this is hitting right in the middle of MockWebConnection.  Since the
> change also needs to go down into HttpWebConnection.getResponse(..) so I
> could add the tests there, but there are not currently any tests for the
> HttpWebConnection.getResponse(..) functions that i can model it after.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> dan
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: htm...@li...
> > [mailto:htm...@li...]On Behalf Of Marc
> > Guillemot
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 6:24 AM
> > To: htm...@li...
> > Subject: Re: [Htmlunit-user] Re: Javascript problem
> >
> >
> > Dave Kosenko wrote:
> > > But I am running v 1.5 and am seeing the problem .  Do you mean that it
> > > is fixed in versions
> > > *after* 1.5?
> >
> > yes, this is has been fixed since version 1.5 and as long as no
> > new release is published, you can only get it using the
> > CVS access.
> >
> > Marc.
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
> > Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
> > opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
> > win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
> > _______________________________________________
> > Htmlunit-user mailing list
> > Htm...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
> Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
> opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
> win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
> _______________________________________________
> Htmlunit-user mailing list
> Htm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user
> 

RE: [Htmlunit-user] Virtual Host feature -- tests?

[Erskine, C. <chr...@ed...>]

I would start by overloading the getPage call to add the extra
parameter.  This would then allow all of the existing calls still work
and you would only be adding the test that calls your new method.

Chris Erskine
=20
EDS Consulting Services
Colorado Springs, CO=20
=20
Phone: 719-265-5962
Cell: 719-640-6488

> -----Original Message-----
> From: htm...@li... [mailto:htmlunit-user-
> ad...@li...] On Behalf Of Dan Levine
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 2:10 PM
> To: htm...@li...
> Subject: [Htmlunit-user] Virtual Host feature -- tests?
>=20
> Hey all,
>=20
> I need to allow virtual host functionality for my tests.  After asking
> here
> a bit ago, I took the issue up with the HttpClient list.  They showed
my
> how
> to achieve this functionality which I began testing out thought the
> HttpClient in the HttpWebConnection class.  turns out there was a bug
in
> HttpClient, and they have now provided a patch.  Now, I would like to
add
> an
> additional parameter to WebClient.getPage(..) to take a String
virtualHost
> in as well as a URL.  I am not sure how to go about writing tests for
this
> however, since none of the getPage(..) functions currently have tests,
and
> since this is hitting right in the middle of MockWebConnection.  Since
the
> change also needs to go down into HttpWebConnection.getResponse(..) so
I
> could add the tests there, but there are not currently any tests for
the
> HttpWebConnection.getResponse(..) functions that i can model it after.
>=20
> Thoughts?
>=20
> dan
>=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: htm...@li...
> > [mailto:htm...@li...]On Behalf Of Marc
> > Guillemot
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 6:24 AM
> > To: htm...@li...
> > Subject: Re: [Htmlunit-user] Re: Javascript problem
> >
> >
> > Dave Kosenko wrote:
> > > But I am running v 1.5 and am seeing the problem .  Do you mean
that
> it
> > > is fixed in versions
> > > *after* 1.5?
> >
> > yes, this is has been fixed since version 1.5 and as long as no
> > new release is published, you can only get it using the
> > CVS access.
> >
> > Marc.
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
> > Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great
events,
> 4
> > opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play
to
> > win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=3D20
> > _______________________________________________
> > Htmlunit-user mailing list
> > Htm...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user
> >
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
> Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great
events, 4
> opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
> win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=3D20
> _______________________________________________
> Htmlunit-user mailing list
> Htm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user

[Htmlunit-user] Virtual Host feature -- tests?

[Dan L. <dl...@ca...>]

Hey all,

I need to allow virtual host functionality for my tests.  After asking here
a bit ago, I took the issue up with the HttpClient list.  They showed my how
to achieve this functionality which I began testing out thought the
HttpClient in the HttpWebConnection class.  turns out there was a bug in
HttpClient, and they have now provided a patch.  Now, I would like to add an
additional parameter to WebClient.getPage(..) to take a String virtualHost
in as well as a URL.  I am not sure how to go about writing tests for this
however, since none of the getPage(..) functions currently have tests, and
since this is hitting right in the middle of MockWebConnection.  Since the
change also needs to go down into HttpWebConnection.getResponse(..) so I
could add the tests there, but there are not currently any tests for the
HttpWebConnection.getResponse(..) functions that i can model it after.

Thoughts?

dan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: htm...@li...
> [mailto:htm...@li...]On Behalf Of Marc
> Guillemot
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 6:24 AM
> To: htm...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Htmlunit-user] Re: Javascript problem
>
>
> Dave Kosenko wrote:
> > But I am running v 1.5 and am seeing the problem .  Do you mean that it
> > is fixed in versions
> > *after* 1.5?
>
> yes, this is has been fixed since version 1.5 and as long as no
> new release is published, you can only get it using the
> CVS access.
>
> Marc.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
> Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
> opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
> win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
> _______________________________________________
> Htmlunit-user mailing list
> Htm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user
>

Re: [Htmlunit-user] Re: Javascript problem

[Marc G. <mgu...@ya...>]

Dave Kosenko wrote:
> But I am running v 1.5 and am seeing the problem .  Do you mean that it 
> is fixed in versions
> *after* 1.5?

yes, this is has been fixed since version 1.5 and as long as no new release is published, you can only get it using the 
CVS access.

Marc.

RE: [Htmlunit-user] Checking out most recent CVS source

[Dan L. <dl...@ca...>]

Checking out most recent CVS sourceAll you need is the most recent html-unit
jar, which can be transferred via disk or cd.  So, something like this:

 - on your windown box, download the source from cvs
 - in that dir run "maven"
 - maven will download all the required libs for compilation, and eventually
will produce a jar named "htmlunit-NextRelease.jar"
 - copy (via disk, CD, network) that file to your classpath on the unix
machine
 - move the old htmlunit.jar out of the classpath
 - run it

dan
  -----Original Message-----
  From: htm...@li...
[mailto:htm...@li...]On Behalf Of Dantes, Ed
  Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 1:13 PM
  To: htm...@li...
  Subject: [Htmlunit-user] Checking out most recent CVS source


  Hello,
          I wanted to get the current copy of the CVS source for htmlunit,
and wondered about something...
      My stuff is on a unix machine, which unfortunately does not have
internet capablilty(I am using the weblogic server as

      to test my web applications).  Is there any way I can get that source
downloaded to my windows pc, and then
      transferring it over to my unix box.  In other words, is the current
source able to be put on a disk or cd, and how would

      I merge that with the existing htmlunit.  If not, what are my other
options??  I am getting script exception errors, saying

      that the Setter configured but has not been implemented.



  Thanks
  Ed

[Htmlunit-user] Checking out most recent CVS source

[Dantes, E. <Ed....@gd...>]

Hello,
        I wanted to get the current copy of the CVS source for htmlunit,
and wondered about something...
    My stuff is on a unix machine, which unfortunately does not have
internet capablilty(I am using the weblogic server as=20
    to test my web applications).  Is there any way I can get that
source downloaded to my windows pc, and then=20
    transferring it over to my unix box.  In other words, is the current
source able to be put on a disk or cd, and how would
    I merge that with the existing htmlunit.  If not, what are my other
options??  I am getting script exception errors, saying=20
    that the Setter configured but has not been implemented.


Thanks
Ed

Re: [Htmlunit-user] Re: Javascript problem

[Dave K. <dko...@ve...>]

But I am running v 1.5 and am seeing the problem .  Do you mean that it is 
fixed in versions
*after* 1.5?

Thanks,
Dave

At 03:10 AM 5/2/2005, you wrote:
>Hi Dave,
>
>this has been fixed since version 1.5. If you build yourself from CVS you 
>will already benefit of the changes.
>
>Marc.
>
>
>Dave Kosenko wrote:
>>To followup my own message, I have determined that, in the scenario 
>>below, in most places in the
>>code, the browser version is correctly transmitted as specified in the 
>>call to WebClient.
>>However, in the code that handles javascript, specifically in 
>>Navigator.java, the value for userAgent as
>>returned by jsGet_userAgent() is always
>>         "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0b Windows98)"
>>regardless of what it should be set to.  As the above string is the 
>>default setting for BrowserVersion,
>>I'd have to guess that Navigator.java is not referencing the 
>>BrowserVersion as set in WebClient()
>>Dave
>>At 01:21 PM 4/29/2005, Dave Kosenko wrote:
>>
>>>Ok, after more complete investigation, I must retract my statement that 
>>>there is a problem with
>>>when the onload() function is being invoked in HTMLUnit.
>>>
>>>However, I think I have found another problem that was actually making 
>>>it look as though onload
>>>was the problem.  It appears that the problem lies with WebClient.  In 
>>>my java program, I set up
>>>a BrowserVersion to emulate Firefox:
>>>
>>>BrowserVersion bv;
>>>...
>>>bv = new BrowserVersion("Netscape", "5.0 (Windows; en-US)", "Mozilla/5.0 
>>>(Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050414 
>>>Firefox/1.0.3", "1.2");
>>>...
>>>WebClient webClient = new WebClient(bv,);
>>>
>>>In the javascript brought into the page, I added an alert to tell me 
>>>what it thought the browser version
>>>is (in the full code, this is critical, since it takes different actions 
>>>based on the type of browser):
>>>
>>>function DetectBrowser() {
>>>         alert(navigator.appName);
>>>         alert(navigator.appVersion);
>>>         alert(navigator.userAgent);
>>>         alert(navigator.appCodeName);
>>>         alert(navigator.platorm);
>>>...
>>>}
>>>
>>>And I get the following when I run the program:
>>>
>>>WARNING: window.alert("Microsoft Internet Explorer") no handler installed
>>>WARNING: window.alert("4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0b; Windows98)") no 
>>>handler installed
>>>WARNING: window.alert("Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0b; Windows98)") 
>>>no handler installed
>>>WARNING: window.alert("Mozilla") no handler installed
>>>WARNING: window.alert("Win32") no handler installed
>>>
>>>So either I am doing something very wrong, or my BrowserVersion is being 
>>>completely ignored.  I also
>>>tried using the various pre-defined BrowserVersion values in the 
>>>BrowserVersion class, all with the same
>>>result.
>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
>>Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
>>opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
>>win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
>>_______________________________________________
>>Htmlunit-user mailing list
>>Htm...@li...
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
>Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
>opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
>win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20
>_______________________________________________
>Htmlunit-user mailing list
>Htm...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlunit-user
>