> Is it safe to assume that 160 is always a non-breakable=20
> space? I know=20
> that some encodings don't use 160 (I've been burned by that=20
> on some unix=20
> machines) but by the time the string has been converted into unicode=20
> within java, this may have already been adjusted.
That's a very good question, which I don't know the answer to. I'm
pretty clueless when it comes to character sets and
internationalization. I think it is part of what it means to be a US
citizen.
Mike
|
