htmlunit-develop

[HtmlUnit] Re: HtmlUnit-develop digest, Vol 1 #66 - 5 msgs

[Brad C. <bc...@bo...>]

We have a few utility functions of our own that are basically just wrappers 
for htmlunit functions. To unit test our functions we make use of 
FakeWebConnection.

Brad C

>Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 21:33:52 -0500
>From: Mike Bowler <mb...@Ga...>
>Organization: Gargoyle Software
>CC:  htm...@li...
>Subject: Re: [HtmlUnit] FakeWebConnection?
>
>Brad Clarke wrote:
>  > Could com.gargoylesoftware.htmlunit.test.FakeWebConnection be included
>  > in the released jar?
>
>Why would you want it included?  FakeWebConnection is a mock object used
>for testing HtmlUnit itself and was never intended to be part of the
>release.
>
>What functionality are you looking for that is in that class?
>
>
>--
>Mike Bowler
>Principal, Gargoyle Software Inc.
>Voice: (416) 822-0973 | Email  : mb...@Ga...
>Fax  : (416) 822-0975 | Website: http://www.GargoyleSoftware.com

Re: [HtmlUnit] Re: HtmlUnit-develop digest, Vol 1 #66 - 5 msgs

[Mike B. <mb...@Ga...>]

Brad Clarke wrote:
> We have a few utility functions of our own that are basically just 
> wrappers for htmlunit functions. To unit test our functions we make use 
> of FakeWebConnection.

Fair enough.  I'd rather not include anything from a test package in the 
released jar so that leaves two choices.

1) I could build a "test" jar containing FakeWebConnection and possibly 
other generic testing classes such as WebTestCase

2) Declare FakeWebConnection to be a released class and move it to one 
of the packages that gets released.

I don't have a strong preference at present so I'll put this up for 
discussion. :-)

-- 
Mike Bowler
Principal, Gargoyle Software Inc.
Voice: (416) 822-0973 | Email  : mb...@Ga...
Fax  : (416) 822-0975 | Website: http://www.GargoyleSoftware.com