Re: [Htmlparser-user] Parsing STYLE tag

[Somik R. <so...@ya...>]

Hi Dhaval,
    This is fixed now. Will be in the next integration release.
    Bytway, do put in bug reports on the site.

Regards,
Somik
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <dha...@or...>
To: <htm...@li...>
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 2:38 PM
Subject: [Htmlparser-user] Parsing STYLE tag


The following tag :
<STYLE type="text/css">
<!--
{somethign....something}
-->
</STLYE>

when parsed through the HTML parser and printed once again using
toHTML() results in the following
<STYLE>
<!--
{something...something}
-->
</STYLE>

As seen the type attribute is disappearing. I think some change on that
front is required.

Regards, 

Dhaval Udani 
Senior Analyst 
M-Line, QPEG 
OrbiTech Solutions Ltd. 
+91-22-8290019 Extn. 1457 



   -----Original Message-----
   From: Udani, Dhaval H. 
   Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:25 PM
   To: htmlparser-user
   Cc: Udani, Dhaval H.
   Subject: RE: [Htmlparser-user] Parsing 'Base' tag ....
   
   
   Hi Somik,
   
   Just to update the below-mentioned list with a bug I had reported
   earlier :
   
   If there are some special characters(we found a problem with <)
   within HTML comments then all lines upto that line(on which the
   charcter is present) gets deleted when you reprint the tag(using
   toHTML()). I have been using Node.toHTML() and I am assuming that the
   tag will get parsed as a HTMLRemarkNode and its toHTML() will get
   called. Whatever the case the output is distinctly different from the
   input. Even the starting HTML comments i.e. <!-- get deleted.

   Regards, 

   Dhaval Udani 
   Senior Analyst 
   M-Line, QPEG 
   OrbiTech Solutions Ltd. 
   +91-22-8290019 Extn. 1457 

   

      -----Original Message-----
      From: somik [mailto:so...@ya...]
      Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 11:55 AM
      To: htmlparser-user
      Cc: somik
      Subject: Re: [Htmlparser-user] Parsing 'Base' tag ....
      
      

      
      Hi Joe,
      Thanks for bringing this up - its been on my mind for a while.
      We should handle this before making the production release.
      As of now, we have a couple of issues to sort out :
      [1] Ensure all testcases pass on Linux
      [2] Look into Dhaval's reports of modification of representation
      of tags
      [3] Handle Base Tags as a special case of the link tag
      [4] Add functionality to the feedback API 
      
      I might be able to spend some time on these from next week. But
      any help in any of these is highly appreciated. 
      
      Regards,
      Somik