Re: [Htmlparser-developer] failing tests

[Somik R. <so...@ya...>]

Hi Josh,
    I don't think that is a good idea. It will encourage developer comfort
with red - which will not help..

    OTOH, I've fixed the ScriptScanner class-  I went thru the discussion
b/w Marc and Derrick, and understood the problem.

    It was actually a simple problem - we had support to tackle fake script
matches, but it would trigger only on a double-quote. Now it also triggers
on a single quote.

    The reason this might not have been apparent is that the class had
smelly code - badly designed by me. I've refactored it to be
intention-revealing, and hopefully manageable.

    I am looking into some of the other failing tests..

Regards,
Somik
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joshua Kerievsky" <jo...@in...>
To: <htm...@li...>
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 12:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Htmlparser-developer] failing tests


> How would you'all feel about creating a package called failingTests that
>   would not be a part of the AllTests suite.  This package would be the
> place we store our failing or temporarily failing tests.  It would also
> be the place we must go, continuously, to rid the package of its failing
> tests.  This would ensure that the bar is always green from the AllTests
> perspective, while still acknowledging areas that need work.
>
> thoughts, feelings, sarcasm?
>
> best regards
> jk
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
> Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here:
> http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
> _______________________________________________
> Htmlparser-developer mailing list
> Htm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlparser-developer