Re: [Htmlparser-developer] CompositeTagScanner - Some comments

[Somik R. <so...@ya...>]

One word of caution, ensure that you are not over-engineering. I didn't do
it, because it wasn't needed. That has been the key to our approach-  and
enabled us to keep the parser really small.

Regards
Somik
----- Original Message -----
From: "Somik Raha" <so...@ya...>
To: <htm...@li...>
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 7:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Htmlparser-developer] CompositeTagScanner - Some comments


>
> > Say something like this is there:
> >
> > <P> blah blah blah
> > <TABLE>
> >
> > Now what I am saying that in the P scanner, if TABLE is provided as a
> member of
> > the STARTERS array then a </P> will be put up before the beginning of
> <TABLE>
> > tag. In essence the way the ENDERS array looks for a tag of type EndTag,
> > similarly STARTERS array would look for a start tag of the type defined.
> >
> > I hope I've been clearer. Do let me know.
>
> I'm with you - initially I was checking for starters - changed that to
> enders. But if we must have both, then we must have both. Go for it. But
> also think deeply about the names- if it was confusing to you and me, it
> would be for others too...
>
> Cheers,
> Somik
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara
> The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions
> www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Htmlparser-developer mailing list
> Htm...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htmlparser-developer