Thread: RE: [Htmlparser-developer] visitNode() [Was: HTMLParser 1.2 - 1.3]

SourceForge Headquarters 225 Broadway Suite 1600 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

> 
> Dhaval Udani wrote:
> > I thought that since Tag extends from Node, a visitNode() 
> method would be
> > appropriate. Apart from that if I want to search for some 
> tags that I have
> not
> > registered (say a <HTML> tag or a <HEAD> tag) I could use 
> the visitNode
> > mechanism to do it.
> 
> No - if you want to search for a "Tag" - you would use visitTag().
> Everything is a Tag. An EndTag is a Tag. All Tags are nodes. 
> A StringNode
> and RemarkNode are also nodes. What node is it that you wish 
> to search for?
> 

Actually I thought that if a particular Tag is not registered via the Scanner 
then it will be parsed as just a Node (not of any specific type that is). But I 
guess its going to get parsed as a Tag then there is no problem. But I just 
wanted to know that what is the design consideration for not having visitNode() 
since Node is superclass of Tag.

Dhaval

Thread: RE: [Htmlparser-developer] visitNode() [Was: HTMLParser 1.2 - 1.3]

htmlparser-developer