Hi Developers,
This is to initiate a discussion on the next step, on integration =
feedback into the parser. Claude had submitted HTMLParserFeedback =
interface (in the util package) - which allow us to log the activity of =
the parser, inform when errors occur, and show warnings.=20
I am familiar with log4j, and this sounds pretty similar - in terms =
of functionality, it sounds good. But in terms of performance, my =
question is :
[1] Will this result in an unacceptable performance hit ?
[2] Should we provide alternate constructors or modify existing API ? If =
we provide alternates, then what default behaviour would be best ? Are =
we talking about default callback objects - if yes, the strings created =
for each call would slow down the parser.
It would be great to have some thoughts on this.
Regards,
Somik
|
