There is no support for (at least)
div -- should at least initiate a new paragraph
style -- should at least be trimmed out
tt -- \textbf
big -- \large
small -- \small
kbd -- \sffamily, perhaps
dfn -- \textit
var -- \sffamily, perhaps
sub -- \textsuperscript, or in math context, \sup
sup -- \textsuperscript, or in math context, \sup
th -- at least support, probably format too
caption -- at least support
tbody --
thead --
colgroup --
col -- at least support width attribute
style -- at least ignore
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I've put in the advised support for the tt,big,small,kbd,dfn and var tags. I guess I'm not as big an HTML expert as I thought, because I've never heard of some of these tags. But, I suppose it wouldn't be too hard to go look up the documentation at www.w3c.org. Some of these tags could be quite complicated to implement (especially the table-related ones...scary). But I'd like some idea of what people would like for the STYLE and DIV tags. I mean, there's the "do practically" nothing idea, and then there's "do exactly what it should", which is much harder.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
I've put in the advised support for the tt,big,small,kbd,dfn and var tags. I guess I'm not as big an HTML expert as I thought, because I've never heard of some of these tags. But, I suppose it wouldn't be too hard to go look up the documentation at www.w3c.org. Some of these tags could be quite complicated to implement (especially the table-related ones...scary). But I'd like some idea of what people would like for the STYLE and DIV tags. I mean, there's the "do practically" nothing idea, and then there's "do exactly what it should", which is much harder.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
There is no support for (at least)
div -- should at least initiate a new paragraph
style -- should at least be trimmed out
tt -- \textbf
big -- \large
small -- \small
kbd -- \sffamily, perhaps
dfn -- \textit
var -- \sffamily, perhaps
sub -- \textsuperscript, or in math context, \sup
sup -- \textsuperscript, or in math context, \sup
th -- at least support, probably format too
caption -- at least support
tbody --
thead --
colgroup --
col -- at least support width attribute
style -- at least ignore
I've put in the advised support for the tt,big,small,kbd,dfn and var tags. I guess I'm not as big an HTML expert as I thought, because I've never heard of some of these tags. But, I suppose it wouldn't be too hard to go look up the documentation at www.w3c.org. Some of these tags could be quite complicated to implement (especially the table-related ones...scary). But I'd like some idea of what people would like for the STYLE and DIV tags. I mean, there's the "do practically" nothing idea, and then there's "do exactly what it should", which is much harder.
I've put in the advised support for the tt,big,small,kbd,dfn and var tags. I guess I'm not as big an HTML expert as I thought, because I've never heard of some of these tags. But, I suppose it wouldn't be too hard to go look up the documentation at www.w3c.org. Some of these tags could be quite complicated to implement (especially the table-related ones...scary). But I'd like some idea of what people would like for the STYLE and DIV tags. I mean, there's the "do practically" nothing idea, and then there's "do exactly what it should", which is much harder.