Re: [htmltmpl] HTML::Template v2.7 is Coming!

[Sam T. <sa...@tr...>]

On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Gabor Szabo wrote:

> On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Sam Tregar wrote:
>
> > Alright, this sounds fine to me.  I'm commiting this now.
>
> Oh thanks ....
> Is this suposed to be the correct CVS ?
> http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/html-template/HTML-Template/
>
> I am asking as I have just checked it out again (which took me
> 30 minutes) and it does not contain the t/ directory yet.

That's right, but I think it runs on a delayed update from the real
CVS source.

> I remember that and also that I was not convinced back then that no_plan
> is a good thing. :)
> Reading it again....
> Still not.:)

Oh well.

> I am using this as I had a number of cases when suddenly part of my tests
> did not run and I did not get any warning about this.

That's very weird.  Did your code die() or seg-fault or something?  If
so Test::Harness should notice and produce a 'dubious' result, not an
'ok'.

> So what do you say, would such thing work ?
> - no_plan during the main development of a test suit
> - plan after it.

How about no_plan all the time?  I can't stand updating magic numbers.
Computers are supposed to do my counting for me!

-sam