Re: [htmltmpl] speeding up an h-t website on a windoze box

[David H. <da...@ho...>]

On 17 Apr 2004, at 21:04, Puneet Kishor wrote:
> Oh, I don't think H-T is necessarily the one taking time (wasn't my 
> intent to seem to blame H-T). I think it is just the way it is with 
> all the other modules, and the script being cgi and all.
>
> I figured that with all the modules I am loading, and my own script, 
> that is probably well over 10k, maybe even 20k lines of code being 
> chewed through every user click. Which is why I tried CGI-Simple, 
> because CGI is really, really heavy.
>
> Since I can't use mod_perl (though, as Cees suggested, FastCGI might, 
> might be an option -- SpeedyCGI is not; it doesn't run on Windows), 
> seems like the only thing I could possibly cache was H-T. Hence the 
> question about IPC-SharedCache.

The compilation of the code is what's killing you.

There *is* some kind of perl persistence module for IIS, or of course 
you *could*
run apache/mod_perl on win32.

-- 
Dave Hodgkinson
CTO, Rockit Factory Ltd.
http://www.rockitfactory.com/
Web sites for rock bands