Re: [htmltmpl] shared_cache with H::T::E

[Mathew R. <mat...@re...>]

> > any ideas...?  I'd like to have a go at implementing it, as I think
> > it would be a worthwhile addition...
>=20
> Why?  I'm not a fan of shared_cache, personally.  It's no faster than
> file_cache and total pain to adminster.  I generally work in
> Apache/mod_perl and use the straight memory cache.

We also use Apache/mod_perl.  The reason is that quite often there will =
be 20 instances of Apache running (ie we get may requests per second).  =
I'd like to reduce the memory usage a bit.  And yes I know that running =
H::T::E is slow, but speed is not the problem, where as memory pressure =
can be (on ocassions).

If you think its not worth it, then no big deal...

cheers,
Mathew