Re: [htmltmpl] Re: H::T future

[Puneet K. <pk...@ei...>]

Karen J. Cravens wrote:

> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Puneet Kishor wrote:
> 
> PK>well, now that you put it that way, I feel I might be the one who is not
> PK>really understanding what you all are saying, and hence, am perhaps
> PK>barking tangentially ;-).
> 
> I think it's just a matter of different approaches.
> 
> The way I've been doing it, as I described earlier, the content was in a
> template.  It relied on includes to pull the HTML in, 

wow! cool... instead of putting the dog in the kennel, you are putting 
the kennel around the dog.

That said, H::T (I believe) sets out to solve the problem of putting the 
  dog in the kennel. The criticism is not at all of other approaches... 
who am I to do that. The question is whether H::T should be changed to 
accommodate putting the kennel around the dog. I believe that would 
deviate from its goal, and perhaps complicate it and weigh it down. imho.

Anyway, thanks for a great discussion.

  ;-)