H::T future (was Re: [htmltmpl] xml complant tags)

[Puneet K. <pk...@ei...>]

Paulsen, Brian wrote:

..
> And, given how frequent H::T gets updated, it would be a MUCH quicker
> solution.
> 
..

speaking of which, I have often wondered what could be improved in H-T, 
and have failed to come up with anything. It just seems to be that 
perfect program that does perfectly what it said to do. Simple to 
install and understand, well-documented, and fast. In fact, imho, it 
should be made a core part of Perl as is CGI.pm.

But, since not being able to visualize the form of H-T's future might be 
due to my lack of imagination, I am curious -- what are the ways in 
which the developer-kind want to see H-T to be in a few years/versions 
or so...