In my experiments with nested templates, I tried
some trickery using associate to avoid the extra
param() calls. However, I've come across an unexpected
result (at least, unexpected to me).
The code below shows two templates (tmpl1 and tmpl2)
each of which associate another template (borrow1 and
borrow2, respectively).
Apparently, the param() call only sets a value in a
template if there is a corresponding TMPL_VAR--even
with die_on_bad_params turned on. Is this intended?
My expectation is that the param would be set in the
object regardless, so that another call to param()
to *get* the value would succeed.
I tried adding global_vars => 1 after line 26, thinking
that might be needed, but the result was the same.
I'm at version 2.8.
Regards,
Brad
1 #!/usr/local/bin/perl
2
3 use strict;
4 use warnings;
5 use HTML::Template;
6
7 my $text = qq'This is a <TMPL_VAR NAME="color"> bird.\n';
8
9 # ---- try 1
10 my $has = '<TMPL_VAR NAME="color">';
11 my $borrow1 = HTML::Template->new(
12 scalarref => \$has,
13 );
14 $borrow1->param( color => 'blue' );
15
16 my $tmpl1 = HTML::Template->new(
17 scalarref => \$text,
18 associate => $borrow1,
19 );
20
21 print "try1: " . $tmpl1->output();
22
23 # ---- try 2
24 my $hasnot = 'dummy';
25 my $borrow2 = HTML::Template->new(
26 scalarref => \$hasnot,
27 die_on_bad_params => 0,
28 );
29 $borrow2->param( color => 'blue' );
30
31 my $tmpl2 = HTML::Template->new(
32 scalarref => \$text,
33 associate => $borrow2,
34 );
35
36 print "try2: " . $tmpl2->output();
37
38 __END__
39 try1: This is a blue bird.
40 try2: This is a bird.
|
