From: Jim <li...@yg...> - 2005-01-15 06:43:33
|
Here is another performance comparison collected when the server was under less load. The data is essentially the same as that used for the last set of numbers. Uncompressed ------------ 416.28 user 97.72 system 1:30:23 elapsed 10510336 Jan 15 00:00 db.docdb 10444800 Jan 15 00:00 db.docs.index 90488832 Jan 15 00:00 db.excerpts 436043776 Jan 15 00:00 db.words.db Compressed ---------- 2008.63 user 133.35 system 2:40:16 elapsed 10526720 Jan 14 09:35 db.docdb 10444800 Jan 14 09:35 db.docs.index 90611712 Jan 14 09:36 db.excerpts 113773568 Jan 14 09:36 db.words.db 16384 Jan 14 09:36 db.words.db_weakcmpr I do have a large data set that I could test with if it would be of real value. However I would need to try rebuilding ht://Dig with large file support before I could consider dropping compression for that set. Jim |