From: Joe R. J. <jj...@cl...> - 2005-01-14 00:49:50
|
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Jim wrote: > Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 23:02:12 -0700 (MST) > From: Jim <li...@yg...> > To: Neal Richter <ne...@ri...> > Cc: htd...@li... > Subject: [htdig-dev] Re: [htdig-members] Results of Possible Efficiency improvment for 3.2.0 > > Moved this to developers list. > > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Neal Richter wrote: > > > As far as speed testing I would love it if a couple of you could > > index a decent sized site (pefferable local to eliminate network latency) > > with and without the index compression enabled and report back your speed & > > size results. > > > > wordlist_compress: false > > wordlist_compress_zlib: false > > Here is what I got. > > With compression: > 2296.03 user > 224.52 system > 8:10:56 elapsed > > 10592256 Jan 10 09:46 db.docdb > 10461184 Jan 10 09:44 db.docs.index > 90120192 Jan 10 09:44 db.excerpts > 113465344 Jan 10 09:44 db.words.db > 16384 Jan 10 09:44 db.words.db_weakcmpr Not that it makes much of a difference, but it looks like you do not compress the excerpts, compression_level: 0; right? > Without compression: > 450.46 user > 123.33 system > 4:56:01 elapsed > > Misplaced the file sizes for this run. I can rerun it some night if it > is important. Add a `/bin/ls -l $DBDIR` line at the end of your rundig-test script, and never misplace them;) > These numbers are for a local dig on a dual Xeon box with RAID 5 and a > couple GB of RAM. No swapping occurred. Hmmm, no swapping! That may be the deciding factor why the change in your elapsed time is so different than mine; or may be your CPU speed;-/ My system is similar to yours, dual Xeon 2.4 GHz box RAID 5 10K RPM SCSI drives, and 2.0 GB DDR RAM; What's your CPU speed? Regards, Joe -- _/ _/_/_/ _/ ____________ __o _/ _/ _/ _/ ______________ _-\<,_ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ ......(_)/ (_) _/_/ oe _/ _/. _/_/ ah jj...@cl... |