Re: [htdig-dev] boolean terms in phrase - bug?

[Joe R. J. <jj...@cl...>]

On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 an...@ti... wrote:

> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 09:46:12 +0200
> From: an...@ti...
> To: Joe R. Jah <jj...@cl...>, lac...@ip...
> Cc: Christopher Murtagh <chr...@mc...>,
     htd...@li...
> Subject: Re: [htdig-dev] boolean terms in phrase - bug?
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
>    Is it possible to have this patch so that I can commit it before 3.2.0b6
> is released? Thank you very much.
> 
> -Gabriele
> 

 ftp://ftp.ccsf.org/htdig-patches/3.2.0b5/boolean-patch.0

I have tested it successfully; it is now in production;)  Chris also
reported to have successfully tested it.

Regards,

Joe
-- 
     _/   _/_/_/       _/              ____________    __o
     _/   _/   _/      _/         ______________     _-\<,_
 _/  _/   _/_/_/   _/  _/                     ......(_)/ (_)
  _/_/ oe _/   _/.  _/_/ ah        jj...@cl...

> >-- Messaggio originale --
> >From: "Joe R. Jah" <jj...@cl...>
> >To: lac...@ip...
> >cc: Christopher Murtagh <chr...@mc...>,
> >   htd...@li...
> >Subject: Re: [htdig-dev] boolean terms in phrase - bug?
> >Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 23:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >
> >On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 lac...@ip... wrote:
> >
> >> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 11:46:59 +1000
> >> From: lac...@ip...
> >> To: Joe R. Jah <jj...@cl...>,
> >     Christopher Murtagh <chr...@mc...>
> >> Cc: htd...@li...
> >> Subject: Re: [htdig-dev] boolean terms in phrase - bug?
> >> 
> >> Greetings all,
> >> 
> >> The attached patch should get things working.
> >
> >Thanks Lachlan.  What a relief!  I have enabled boolean option on my
> >search forms again;)
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Joe
> >-- 
> >     _/   _/_/_/       _/              ____________    __o
> >     _/   _/   _/      _/         ______________     _-\<,_
> > _/  _/   _/_/_/   _/  _/                     ......(_)/ (_)
> >  _/_/ oe _/   _/.  _/_/ ah        jj...@cl...
> >
> >> Thanks again, Chris, for pointing this bug out.
> >> 
> >> Cheers,
> >> Lachlan
> >> 
> >> 
> >> >-- Original Message --
> >> >On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Christopher Murtagh wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>  That's what I thought. Thanks for the feedback. In my position, I'm
> >> >> fortunate that I have a php wrapper that is cleaning up all input
> before
> >> >> it is sent to htsearch, so I can write a little function that will
> strip
> >> >> these. However, it might be a good idea for the htdig team to let
> other
> >> >> folks who are currently using 3.2 in production about this as this
> makes
> >> >> it easy to cripple any machine running htdig 3.2 with boolean search
> >> >> feature.