From: Gabriele B. <an...@ti...> - 2004-06-09 22:31:43
|
Hi Gilles, At 22.10 09/06/2004, Gilles Detillieux wrote: >Just curious, but why did you need to manually apply my patch? Did it >not work with the patch command? The manual changes to conf_lexer.lxx >were OK, despite lots of changes to the indentation which now make it >harder to read (remember standard tab stops are 8 spaces), but you missed >one of my changes to conf_parser.yxx, which is likely to break things. No, it did not work. I had all the changes rejected. I tried to apply it against the latest CVS code. That's probably why I stuffed things up. However, I am sorry about the indentation problem, I had 4 spaces set. >It would be a shame to release yet another beta release and still not >have these problems fixed! Proper error handling has been lacking for >a long time, and many users have been confused by the config parser's >cryptic error messages. This will at least tell them what file to look >at, and the proper line number when using includes. The problem with >files then end without a newline has caught many people too. OK. I perfectly agree with you. That's why I asked people's opinion and I rely on yours very much. >this patch to go into b6, but it would be a good idea if a few other >developers tested it first, as I asked back in April. All I can say is >it works for me (but I tested it using flex 2.5.4a, and only on RH 9). You are right. I did not have a chance to try it before. However, tomorrow I will regenerate the conf_parser.cxx file and commit the changes, and prepare the new release tarball. If everything is fine, I will release 3.2.0b6 on friday morning Central Europe Time. Sounds good? Ciao and thanks, -Gabriele -- Gabriele Bartolini: Web Programmer, ht://Dig & IWA/HWG Member, ht://Check maintainer Current Location: Prato, Toscana, Italia an...@ti... | http://www.prato.linux.it/~gbartolini | ICQ#129221447 > "Leave every hope, ye who enter!", Dante Alighieri, Divine Comedy, The Inferno |