Re: [htdig-dev] Almost there...

[Neil K. <nk...@ma...>]

Here's a performance quirk I've found.=20

I was running some timed tests on our development box and noticed that the =
3.2.0b5 release was causing performance to suffer for logged in users. =
System load and memory were OK. But the web site and databases were on the =
same disk so things were getting disk-bound. Moving the databases and =
logging to a separate disk solved the problem and I'm rerunning the tests.

i/o problems haven't been an issue with 3.1.6. Does 3.2 do more writing?

>> Job well done!  It configured/built/ran out of the box on my BSD/OS-4.3.=
1
>> with gcc 2.95.3 like a charm; It took only 96 minutes to index my =
site;)

> How does this compare to earlier 3.2.0b4 snapshots, and to 3.1.6?
> Is 3.2.0b5 significantly slower than 3.1 releases, and is it better or
> worse than earlier 3.2 betas?



Neil Kohl
Manager, ACP Online             =20
American College of Physicians
nk...@ac...              215.351.2638, 800.523.1546 x2638