|
From: Neal R. <ne...@ri...> - 2003-10-22 19:51:00
|
Gabriele wrote: > 1) leave the code as is > 2) remove the overriding of the head before get in the incremental dig > > In both cases we need to write down a better documentation for this > attribute (especially in the option 2 where we should talk about the > benefits of a HEAD call in the incremental dig). > > I must confess. I would prefer option 2, as I think users' must have full > control of the tool and IMHO by adding a default behaviour of HEAD before > GET to the system we've done our part. OK, you've convinced me, it IS useful to have this switch be user controlled.. I wasn't aware of the non-compliant servers causing an issue. Clearly 'automatic' behavior in that case is a bad thing. Go with option 2. Thanks! Neal Richter Knowledgebase Developer RightNow Technologies, Inc. Customer Service for Every Web Site Office: 406-522-1485 |