|
From: Lachlan A. <lh...@us...> - 2003-10-22 13:35:08
|
Greetings all, I've only been following this thready loosely, but my opinions are: 1. In version 3.2.1 (or 3.3, or 4.0) there should be three possible=20 settings: true, false, auto. That way the user has complete=20 control, but doesn't need to exert it. 2. We are in feature freeze, and scheduled to release in one week's=20 time, at the end of October. We should minimise changes to the code. =20 Has a bug report been filed for this issue yet? Wasn't the plan to=20 have no CVS commits without reference to a bug number? Cheers, Lachlan On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 08:30, Gabriele Bartolini wrote: > So ... we have 2 possibilities now: > > 1) leave the code as is > 2) remove the overriding of the head before get in the incremental > dig > > I must confess. I would prefer option 2, as I think users' must > have full control of the tool and IMHO by adding a default > behaviour of HEAD before GET to the system we've done our part. --=20 lh...@us... ht://Dig developer DownUnder (http://www.htdig.org) |