Re: [htdig-dev] allow_numbers

[Gilles D. <gr...@sc...>]

According to Neal Richter:
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Gilles Detillieux wrote:
> > Speaking of committing to CVS, Neal, what's up with your request to hold off?
...
> > What was the busy work other than adding bug tracker categories, which
> > you mentioned in your earlier message?  Are you done and is it OK to
> > commit now?  I noticed some people have been doing so.
> 
>   Nothing really.. the idea was at this point we should have
> a 'Include_in_3.2' bug associated with each 'commit' until we release.
> This is purely for the purpose of 'tracking' the bugs & fixes.
> 
>   I was wanting to get the 'Include_in_3.2' group added first... and clean
> up the bug list.  That's done.
> 
>   No offense intended there... I was just trying to get some measure of
> organization to the 'Feature-Freeze' state we are in now.
> 
>   ie.. during 'feature-freeze' there should be a bug created for each
> issue, and any commits should list the bug number in the commit message.
> 
>   This isn't an attempt to exert control.. just to help organize the
> process.

No offense taken at all.  I was just a bit puzzled as to the reason
and the status of your request to hold off.  This helps clarify things
a lot.  I'm all for organizing the process better, but I think what you
just said needed to be stated explicitly so we all understand what the
process ought to be.  Thanks.

-- 
Gilles R. Detillieux              E-mail: <gr...@sc...>
Spinal Cord Research Centre       WWW:    http://www.scrc.umanitoba.ca/
Dept. Physiology, U. of Manitoba  Winnipeg, MB  R3E 3J7  (Canada)