|
From: Lachlan A. <lh...@us...> - 2003-10-11 02:46:19
|
Greetings all, I propose that we call the next stage "feature freeze", rather than=20 "code freeze", since we'll be changing the code as we fix bugs. =20 After that, we could have a week of actual code-freeze, so we can all=20 re-run our tests on the final product. Attached is a more completed breakdown of attributes to test. I'll=20 take those under the headings which I've put (lha) after, and have=20 already verified those ending with lha. I agree with Neal that we really need people to say what testing they=20 have time for, and to pick one or more groups of attributes. Can I=20 ask one of our multi-lingual developers to test the=20 internationalisation (even though those attributes are also all in=20 other groups)? FYI, I'm also attaching a couple of scripts that I eventually want to=20 put in .../test -- one is a utility to set an attribute in a=20 temporary config file, and the other is what I've been using to test=20 the "fuzzy" rules. (It needs some other files to run, but could form=20 a template for other people's testing.) It would be nice to build up=20 a complete test suite to make the next release easier. Thanks in advance to all those who can chip in. Lachlan --=20 lh...@us... ht://Dig developer DownUnder (http://www.htdig.org) |