Re: [htdig-dev] Re: Is this a bug?

[Neal R. <ne...@ri...>]

I've got a fix for it.. a couple lines of code in the section that builds
the linked list of search results...

On Sat, 20 Sep 2003, Lachlan Andrew wrote:

> Yes, that does sound like a bug!  Well spotted, Neal!
>
> However, if reindexing obsoletes *removed* pages correctly, then I'd
> vote not to delay the release to fix the behaviour for pages which
> still exist but "shouldn't" be found.  Perhaps it would be best to
> file a bug report and fix it in 3.2.1...
>
> Opinions?
>
> Lachlan
>
> On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:07, Neal Richter wrote:
> > I'm using a fairly recent cvs snapshot...
> >
> >
> > 1) index a website
> >
> > 2) use search terms to return a given page.
> >
> > 3) Take links to that page out of the website
> >
> > 4) reindex site (don't use htdig -i)
> >
> > 5) repeat #2
> >
> > I would think that this page should be 'obsoleted' and not returned
> > after the reindex..
> >
> > htpurge does not touch these document since they haven't been
> > marked as obsolete...
>
> --
> lh...@us...
> ht://Dig developer DownUnder  (http://www.htdig.org)
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> ht://Dig Developer mailing list:
> htd...@li...
> List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.)
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev
>

Neal Richter
Knowledgebase Developer
RightNow Technologies, Inc.
Customer Service for Every Web Site
Office: 406-522-1485