|
From: Lachlan A. <lh...@us...> - 2003-09-20 13:59:57
|
Yes, that does sound like a bug! Well spotted, Neal! However, if reindexing obsoletes *removed* pages correctly, then I'd=20 vote not to delay the release to fix the behaviour for pages which=20 still exist but "shouldn't" be found. Perhaps it would be best to=20 file a bug report and fix it in 3.2.1... Opinions? Lachlan On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:07, Neal Richter wrote: > I'm using a fairly recent cvs snapshot... > > > 1) index a website > > 2) use search terms to return a given page. > > 3) Take links to that page out of the website > > 4) reindex site (don't use htdig -i) > > 5) repeat #2 > > I would think that this page should be 'obsoleted' and not returned > after the reindex.. > > htpurge does not touch these document since they haven't been > marked as obsolete... --=20 lh...@us... ht://Dig developer DownUnder (http://www.htdig.org) |