RE: [htdig-dev] Missing htconfig.h

[David B. <D.B...@vp...>]

Hi Lachlan, I grabbed a new CVS and its perfect !

So its passing all my tests, but I'm sure you have some more serious tests,
want me to run them ? If so, please let me know how.

Thanks for the great work!

Now, want some other platforms tested ? I can do AIX, HPUX (soon) and Apple
Darwin if its any use to you.

David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: htd...@li...
> [mailto:htd...@li...]On Behalf Of Lachlan
> Andrew
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 12:25 AM
> To: D.B...@vp...
> Cc: htd...@li...; Gabriele Bartolini
> Subject: [htdig-dev] Missing htconfig.h
>
>
> Greetings David,
>
> Thanks for doing that testing.  The file .../include/htconfig.h  is in
> both CVS and the 7 September snapshot, and should be present.  It is
> possible that  ./configure  is removing it (it used to generate it
> from htconfig.h.in), or that the  -I  flags are not being set
> correctly on the Itanium.
>
> Could you please
> 1. Check if  .../include/htconfig.h  is indeed there.
> 2. If so, tell us the exact command which fails, including all flags,
> and the  ./configure  options you used.
> 3. If  .../include/htconfig.h  is not there:
> 3.a  Download/extract a fresh copy (from any time after 24 August)
> 3.b  Check that  include/htconfig.h  is there.  If not, let us know.
> 3.c  ./configure, and check if  .../include/htconfig.h  has gone.
> 3.d  If not, see if  make all  removes it.
> 3.e  If it is still there but  make  fails, go to 2 :)
>
> Thanks again,
> Lachlan
>
> > From: "David Bannon" <D.B...@vp...>
> >
> > I try it under Itanium RH Advanced server from time to time ....
> >
> > My (week or so ago) test still fails to compile with the same error
> > I posted
> > several weeks ago. I did not get any responses from developers then
> > so have not perused it.
> >
> > It fails with a message to the effect of :
> > Configuration.cc:20:22: htconfig.h: No such file or directory
> >
> > A quick read of the cvs indicates that htconfig.h has been removed,
> > then
> > reinstated etc. So I asked the developers if it should be there, in
> > which
> > case I should find out why its not there, or if it should not be
> > there, I'll
> > need to find our why the makefile is looking for it.
>
> --
> lh...@us...
> ht://Dig developer DownUnder  (http://www.htdig.org)
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> ht://Dig Developer mailing list:
> htd...@li...
> List information (subscribe/unsubscribe, etc.)
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev