|
From: Gabriele B. <bar...@in...> - 2003-07-04 17:06:28
|
At 22.23 24/06/2003 +1000, Lachlan Andrew wrote:
> > I agree with Geoff. I don't know though if at this time it is
> > better to wait for 3.2.0b5 to be out.
>
>Hear, hear! :)
Hi there,
I gave a look at autotools stuff (autoconf, autoheader, autoscan,
automake ...) and I must confess that now life is sooooooo much *easier*
than a couple of years ago.
First (thanks to my friend Marco's work) I could port configure scripts
to a clearer situation: I remember when I first introduced it to ht://Check
it was more a cut+paste operation, sniffing code from basically Loic's work
on ht://Dig.
Now, especially with autoscan and autoheader, the situation is much better.
Having said this, I have a few proposals to do: during this week-end I
will bring my laptop to my countryhouse (where I don't have the Internet so
I may not answer you) and try and hack the code in order to include at
least these 2 things:
- check for C++ standard library
- check for C++ namespaces
Essentially these two m4 macros (taken from the configure archive) will
define 2 preprocessor variables in config.h (we must get rid of acconfig.h
according to new autoconf's directives because it is deprecated) called
HAVE_STD and HAVE_NAMESPACES and I'll modify the code whenever iostream.h
(and similar like 'iomanip', etc.) is called.
Sounds good?
However, I really hope I can contribute this patch early next week.
Ciao and thanks
-Gabriele
--
Gabriele Bartolini: Web Programmer, ht://Dig & IWA/HWG Member, ht://Check
maintainer
Current Location: Prato, Tuscany, Italy
bar...@in... | http://www.prato.linux.it/~gbartolini | ICQ#129221447
> "Leave every hope, ye who enter!", Dante Alighieri, Divine Comedy, The
Inferno
|