|
From: Lachlan A. <lh...@us...> - 2003-06-21 14:04:05
|
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 09:46, Neal Richter wrote: > =09There is pretty minimal impact for Unix code. The question is do > you want me to sit on this or go ahead and check it in? Greetings Neal, I've recently found that there is a big bug in the database code when=20 the size of a page is reduced, as when re-indexing. Rather than=20 hacking my earlier hack to limit the depth of recursion, we might=20 have to implement a proper fix before the beta goes out. However, I=20 don't think I'll have time for that for the next two months :( Translation: I'm in favour of your checking it in. > db/mp_alloc.c: > > I added two new functions CDB_get_mp_dirty_level & > CDB_set_mp_dirty_level and made the CDB___mp_dirty_level static to > db/mp_alloc.c. This is slightly cleaner that a true global > variable and prevented some dllexporting win32 crap. Yes, it was only ever meant to be a hack to tide us over until after=20 the next beta. That variable (and the config variable) will=20 disappear before 3.2.0b6... Cheers, Lachlan --=20 lh...@us... ht://Dig developer DownUnder (http://www.htdig.org) |