[htdig-dev] Re: Re: Residual database errors

[Lachlan A. <lh...@us...>]

Just a thought, but may the problem be related to:
=09General Access Method Changes:
=096. Fix a bug in which DB-managed memory returned by a DB->get or
=09   DB->put call may be corrupted by a later cursor call. [#3576]
?  My suspicion comes since  mp_cmpr_alloc  calls  get()  and Jim's=20
example shows that it can recursively burrow further than we'd like.

It is still taking me forever to understand all the code/changes...

Cheers,
Lachlan

On Monday 10 March 2003 17:57, Neal Richter wrote:

> I did however look at over snapshots of BDB
> (http://www.sleepycat.com/download/patchlogs.shtml)