|
From: Lachlan A. <lh...@us...> - 2003-03-12 11:36:17
|
Just a thought, but may the problem be related to: =09General Access Method Changes: =096. Fix a bug in which DB-managed memory returned by a DB->get or =09 DB->put call may be corrupted by a later cursor call. [#3576] ? My suspicion comes since mp_cmpr_alloc calls get() and Jim's=20 example shows that it can recursively burrow further than we'd like. It is still taking me forever to understand all the code/changes... Cheers, Lachlan On Monday 10 March 2003 17:57, Neal Richter wrote: > I did however look at over snapshots of BDB > (http://www.sleepycat.com/download/patchlogs.shtml) |