|
From: Geoff H. <ghu...@ws...> - 2003-01-08 16:15:42
|
> This seems like something I could do. Could you please provide more > detail on what exactly needs to be done? For example, do we want to have > each configure option in it's own html file a la php.net's documentation I guess that's certainly a possibility--I think the original idea was that we'd keep an attrs.html for backwards-URL compatibility, but we'd have a few "category" pages. Certainly we could do both--have a "category" index and then separate pages for each attribute. But I think in some cases, it's useful to show examples in the documentation of using multiple related attributes together. > Also, what version of htdig et al are we preparing this documentation > for? 3.2.x. The defaults.cc file (or defaults.xml file, if you've been following that) has a "category" field like "File Layout" or "Indexing" that should be a separate page. -Geoff |