[htdig-dev] Re: String.cc change in 3.2.0b4-20021229 rationale ?

[Lachlan A. <lh...@us...>]

Greetings,

That was a trial forward-port from 3.1.6.  It is just defensive programmi=
ng=20
not to try using a string of negative length.

(Sorry about the lack of Changelog entry.  I've since discovered that=20
Changelog entries *aren't* generated as part of the CVS checkin process. =
=20
*sheepish grin* )

On Saturday 04 January 2003 02:05, Budd, Sinclair wrote:
>  I notice that there is a fix in 3.2.0b4-20021229  String.cc but no men=
tion
> in the changelog. What is the rational for change?
>
> <     if (s && len > 0)
> ---
> >     if (s && len !=3D 0)