|
From: Conrad S. <co...@sc...> - 2002-10-16 00:03:33
|
On Tuesday, October 15, 2002, at 05:50 PM, Jim Cole wrote: > Conrad Schilbe's bits of Tue, 15 Oct 2002 translated to: > >> My first post to this mailing list... if it should go somewhere else, >> let me know. > > For this type of question, the htdig-general lists would be > more appropriate than the developer list. Thanks, any posts of this manner will go there in the future. > >> Currently this is how I see it happening. I create multiple instances >> of rundig that index the individual sites and create database files >> for >> each. I then create a copy of these and merge them into one common >> index. > > Sounds like a reasonable approach. ht://Dig is certainly capable > of handling this type of setup. > >> Is there components of the database that should not be duplicated for >> each site? Is there an easier way to achieve my goals? Maybe a way to >> have one db but specify the site within the args? > > Have you read http://www.htdig.org/FAQ.html#q4.20 ? In particular > the parts about restrict and exclude? Also see Excellent! Looks like this the best way to do it. And in the FAQ... don't I feel like a fool... > > http://www.htdig.org/attrs.html#exclude > http://www.htdig.org/attrs.html#restrict > > These attributes provide a means for filtering search results in > a manner that might be useful for what you are trying to do. > > Jim > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: viaVerio will pay you up to > $1,000 for every account that you consolidate with us. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4749864;7604308;v? > http://www.viaverio.com/consolidator/osdn.cfm > _______________________________________________ > htdig-dev mailing list > htd...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/htdig-dev > > |