|
From: Adam B. <ad...@fr...> - 2002-09-08 11:34:06
|
Hi All, Thanks for the feedback. I've installed the 3.2 Beta4 snapshot that was=20 available. The cookie support is working fine using: disable_cookies: false=20 I was able to log in to our WebGUI (highly recommended:=20 http://www.plainblack.com/webgui) development site by using:=20 start_url:http://www.mysite.org.au/?op=3Dlogin&username=3Dusername&identi= fier=3Dpassword=20 (this approach also works for the Phprojekt component of the site). The=20 cookies must have worked because Htdig was subsequently able to index=20 protected pages. As a first timer with Htdig my first impressions have been very positive = with=20 snappy performance and 90% of the functionality we require out of the box= =2E Our site has multiple user and groups who can see diferent pages. They al= so=20 need to be able to choose the type of information source: organisations,=20 publications and/or discussions. I am currently intending to implement th= is=20 by creating numerous different htdig databases created by searching selec= t=20 parts of the site with appropriate permissions. A wrapper script will com= bine=20 several searches and order the results by category. The site is for an NGO in Melbourne, Australia that provides women's=20 information services. Our approach is to make the search engine the prima= ry=20 source of public and internal information. Results with Htdig are=20 encouraging. regards, Adam On Saturday 07 September 2002 07:09, Gabriele Bartolini wrote: > Ciao Gilles, > > thanks for pointing to the cookies patch. Yes, it is a backporting > patch from 3.2.x and works pretty well on my Linux system. I expect oth= er > people on different platforms to test it and give me some feedback > regarding portability. > > As far as patch posting is concerned, I don't know whether Joe rece= ived > my e-mail 2 days ago. If you need more stuff please tell me, ok? > > >How you'd use that for authorisation may be another matter, though. > >I don't know if Gabriele's cookie support has a way of pre-loading coo= kies > >from another browser into htdig's cookie jar. Care to comment, Gabrie= le? > >(Or anyone else for that matter?) > > Well, to be sincere it is not a difficult thing. The code was desig= ned > to support any kind of Cookies storage, it is pretty flexible indeed. F= or > now only the memory jar is supported. This regards though the persisten= cy > of cookies among different crawls, which is different to the pre-loadin= g of > cookies. This should not be a big work to do as I just said. > > We only need a format for storing them. We could decide this, if yo= u > want. My vote would be to store them in a text file using the HTTP synt= ax. > By doing this, we would avoid any kind of parsing and the insertion int= o > the memory Jar would be straightforward. > > I don't know though if this is a flexible solution and the right o= ne, > because it seems to go against the usual way of configuration and leads= in > some cases to confusion (a user should use the specific and exact synta= x in > order to issue one or more cookies). Any ideas? > > Ciao ciao and thanks for rising up the topic > -Gabriele |